Sorry. Let me be clear. Either free speech for all, even “hate” speech is allowed or nothing.
There is no grey area. I might dislike what you’re saying but will fight for you regardless of perceived differences. Anything less is not free speech.
Discussion
Sure, it's logically a "clear cut" area, I'll give you as much.
But theissue here isthat if you're supporting the liberties of your sworn enemies simultaneously with them cheering on your defeats, you're just committing suicide in slow motion.
I'm unsure if you understand what's at stake here.
This is the main problem with libertarianism. You can't have freedoms for the whole world when the rest of the world is out to destroy you.
You need protections against outsiders or they will take your freedoms away.
Bingo.
This is getting close to where my take on the subject applies.
I believe the founders of the USA knew that we have inalienable rights. Just like the color of my eyes, they cannot be given to me, or taken away. Everyone is born with these rights.
HOWEVER, it is the US law, (which is bound by our borders and legal citizens), that says the government should protect and not infringe on these rights. This means it is not the duty of the US government to protect those rights for non-US citizens, no matter where they reside.
Interesting thought that the US DoI was a universalist document.
Trespassing on private property isn't speech.