He has that covered too. In fact he is courting it. If others copy him, he wins as first-mover. You should listen to his earlier interviews. He said when he first bought BTC he was in a semi-panic because "what if someone else figured this out before me".
Discussion
If I cut down a tree to make a fire, there is no problem.
If everybody on the planet cuts down a tree to make a fire, we have a problem, even though, as first "chopper" I am warm and cosy.
I get what you are saying, but it seems a stretch. If demand outstrips supply that puts upwards pressure on the price and increases MSTR margin of safety.
Oh, it will take time, all other systemic failures take years.
We have yet to fail from the abolition of the gold standard in 1971.
Temporary suspesion, you mean? 😂
Oh yes, sorry I forgot 😂
Leveraging an advantage ceases to be effective when everybody else does the same.
And when everybody tries to lever an advantage over everybody else, the system they are leveraging collapses.
If you are clever enough, you leave that system before the collapse happens. That is true genius.
A bad fighter looses
A good fighter wins
A genius fighter doesn't fight.
Well, he has an advantage until others figure it out. He could leave and sell his bitcoin, but sell it for what? You have to find something better than bitcoin. And that is hard.
Land is better than Bitcoin.
Bitcoin, gold, stocks and shares and property are all artificial constructs to a greater or lesser degree.
N.B. Gold value is an artificial construct, not gold itself!
Land is not.
But land is not fungible and is stable in value.
Also, land ownership requires trust and permissions, so has traditional disadvantages.
As for what to sell Bitcoin for, nothing in the foreseeable future. But plenty in the unforeseeable future.
Land was good when you were able to protect it with your punches, stickes, stones maybe guns
Today land does not belong to people but to bigger constructs, so comparison makes little sense
