My bet is faster and more substantial is the goal, not the illicit part.

nostr:nevent1qqsvqshd52axznp9f8szk9p5ewryfexwxuca935rpvsec0vad5l294qpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsygp5w3r3yzn6syfr7yc6elv3wzxa9wz6eg8x5xry03k249v3fezhxcpsgqqqqqqs6leg7d

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Doesn’t a bill which allows law enforcement to freeze crypto without a conviction essentially just a law that allows law enforcement to freeze crypto?

You keep saying freeze when you mean steal.

Well they are explicitly giving permission to seize it before they ever prove anything to anyone about whether it’s “illicit” or even what they fucking mean by that word… so you are correct. It’s clearly not the part they care about.

The next step is to define illicit with a blurry definition...

It will most likely be in the name of “safety”.

True!

People need to learn, that blurry definition means more overreach.