I think most do see bitcoiners, and think this is a bitcoin group, and that's it. No more complicated then that. Just someone told them try nostr out (you can own your account, etc.), they came, found out it's all bitcoiners, they don't care much about bitcion, so they left. That simple.
If someone told me to try out a social network that "lets you own your account", and I jumped in to check it out, and all I saw it was all Warhammer 40,000 people posting Warhammer 40,000 things, I'd be like 'well I guess this is a Warhammer 40,000 club', and I'd jump out.
I don't think big picture stuff like how this compares to the centralised experience even has time to enter the picture. People are out before they've even kicked a single tire.
I think I'm 50% in agreement. Not sure of the magic formula for retaining that type of person who comes for sovereignty and leaves cause Bitcoin. Is the answer corporate management, marketing, removal of zaps from a solid client?
Still unclear how organic diversity is cultivated other than having a "killer app".
I'm pretty convinced organic diversity is cultivated by having organic diversity from close to the start of the protocol. Not by a killer app, or by centralised servers, but by raw timing.
Which means the best option might be a full restart.
You haven’t even been here for a year and you don’t even follow 100 users. Go join Pubky or build your “Nostr 2.0” if you think they’re doing it better. You won’t be missed.

Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed