leave it.
transaction unlinkabiity is better using monero subaddresses with the monero gui wallet or whatever
than with Phoenix or muun or any sovereign node with just a channel or two
and that's #facts folks
leave it.
transaction unlinkabiity is better using monero subaddresses with the monero gui wallet or whatever
than with Phoenix or muun or any sovereign node with just a channel or two
and that's #facts folks
Then how come I can trace my xmr transactions to you but you can't trace your xmr transactions to me? I'll even use Phoenix if it helps you
Oops, I meant "your LN transactions to me"
are you drunk?
that isn't what we are talking about.
YOU'RE saying because there's a possible *active attack* on a monero user that could be executed by a sophisticated adversary that could result in them linking two subaddresses together (OMG),
users should always send from a new wallet by default.
(which is bullshit)
and as if most LN users transactions aren't trivially linked together by their custodian or the one or two LSPs they have a channel with...
now you want to talk about knowing where the money goes?
well ok I guess
but you haven't said anything about your first FUD yet.
> which is bullshit
If "create an entirely new wallet for every tx" is bad advice then maybe submit a PR to withdraw that advice from the monero project's website
> most LN users transactions [are] trivially linked together by their custodian or the one or two LSPs they have a channel with
I acknowledge that most LN users are not using it in a privacy preserving way. Do you acknowledge that most monero users aren't?