> STN starts talking about problems with bbllpckchain privacy, but somehow makes it all about Monero
These problems apply to other blockchain-based privacy systems too
The fact that other terrible systems also have these problems is no excuse for monero
leave it.
transaction unlinkabiity is better using monero subaddresses with the monero gui wallet or whatever
than with Phoenix or muun or any sovereign node with just a channel or two
and that's #facts folks
Then how come I can trace my xmr transactions to you but you can't trace your xmr transactions to me? I'll even use Phoenix if it helps you
Oops, I meant "your LN transactions to me"
are you drunk?
that isn't what we are talking about.
YOU'RE saying because there's a possible *active attack* on a monero user that could be executed by a sophisticated adversary that could result in them linking two subaddresses together (OMG),
users should always send from a new wallet by default.
(which is bullshit)
and as if most LN users transactions aren't trivially linked together by their custodian or the one or two LSPs they have a channel with...
now you want to talk about knowing where the money goes?
well ok I guess
but you haven't said anything about your first FUD yet.
> which is bullshit
If "create an entirely new wallet for every tx" is bad advice then maybe submit a PR to withdraw that advice from the monero project's website
> most LN users transactions [are] trivially linked together by their custodian or the one or two LSPs they have a channel with
I acknowledge that most LN users are not using it in a privacy preserving way. Do you acknowledge that most monero users aren't?
