Core VS Knots, it’s destroying Bitcoin:

This debate is showing a great flaw with BTC and crypto in general.

Sure, you can say this debate is just between nerds on something that’s not particularly important anyway.

But it shows an underlying thread that will be pulled on and only get worse.

Apparently MARA is driving the push for Knots. Maybe it’s good, maybe it’s not, I don’t know enough.

But what I do know is that as miners get bigger, and get more control, they’ll want to get more power and stay in control; government sized control.

And if a bunch of nerds can decide to change the code on their whim, and if that bunch of nerds turns into mainly just a few massive miners who control the hash, then the money isn’t immutable, it’s nerd control.

That’s not sound money.

#asknostr #changemymind #knots #core #debate

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

are they talking about it on fox or cnn?

this is the place for the debate. and, it's not destroying, it's shining a light.

You missed the point

It's a great nothingburger.

Don’t confuse “miners” with “mining pools”.

ANYONE can change the code, but you have to convince node operators to run it.

And if the miners are the largest amount of node operators?

Where did you come up with that?

Answer the question

It’s a nonsensical question.

Reply in more than 1/2 a sentence or fuck off

Your question doesn’t make any sense.

That is a full sentence. It has a subject (“Your question”) and a predicate (“doesn’t make any sense”), forming a complete thought.

Without clarifying info it’s not a sentence it’s being an asshole

Mara only has about 5% of the hashrate of the network. How the fuck are they supposed to be “the largest amount of node operators”?

Got it, so you being short with your reply’s was because you’re an unserious asshole.

Go back and read what I wrote and try to have just a bit of foresight instead of being a retarded fuckwit.

i might be wrong but, it’s not a change in consensus, right? so ultimately i don’t think it matters. two philosophies but neither are fundamentally changing bitcoin. they just disagree on how certain transactions should be entered onto the ledger. either directly, or indirectly.

knots is like your mother trying to tell you not to do something, but you can find a way to do it anyways.

core is like your father telling you it’s stupid to do something, but he is not gonna stop you.

I would contend that it is not destroying but actually making it stronger

Does no one know how to read?

Have you all lost reading comprehension or did you simply never have it?

Mara driving push for knots? Makes zero sense.

Sounds like you don't understand what Bitcoin really is. Study more then give your opinion please

Then correct me and don’t be an asshole.

Man, all you Bitcoin people are fucking obnoxious. One liner replies with zero additional context.

Tell me you probably don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about but wish to act like to do.

Okay

I don't have enough time to talk with you. I wish you would read "The Bitcoin Standard" or "The Fiat Standard." I prefer the latter.

Neither of those contradict what I’ve said here.

It’s apparent you don’t know what you’re talking about and likely haven’t read those books.

Whatever you think is doesn't matter to me anymore. I have read those books. Please stop talking to me.

“I don’t know what I’m talking about. I actually just tried to silence you with “you should study!” But now that you’ve called out my bullshit I’d like for you to go away.”

No.

The whole debate is mostly a nothing burger. Form your own opinion and use the software you want. Either one is better than not running a node. If you don't want jpegs in the block chain, don't propagate or mine them. If enough people agree, those transactions will cost more and sometimes fail. Market forces will deal with the rest either way. Bitcoin is working as intended.

You missed the point as well.