How can you know God if you reject his word? No idolatry

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

you know what the latin word for writing is, right? scripto... to scratch or engrave

there is no substitute for direct connection with the divine, anything concrete is intermediate and thus capable of becoming an idol and a fetish that separates you from your divine nature

the catholics allow statues, the orthodox allow icons, the muslims allow The Book and the black cube at the end of the Hajj, the jews have their candelabra and their torah

bruce lee sums up the meaning of "thou shalt have no god before me" and "don't worship graven images" in his monologue about the finger pointing to the moon

if that means you think i am a heretic, that is sad for you

it means i think of you and most religious people as idolators too, it is in the animal nature of humans to worship and follow leaders and codes and identify with collectives, all i can do is just point that out, and i only am going to do it once

You are right. Catholic church was infiltrated by Jews and Jesuits in the early days and fell to identity politics now. There is not Good Church now. They all do non-biblical things. I go by the Bible only.

many good christians are this way nowadays with how utterly brazenly obedient the orthodoxy has been to the plainly evil corruption of pharma, media, intelligence and government

my mother stopped going to church 25 years ago because of it, and she developed a phobia towards reading religious texts and the bible as well as a result, she mostly concerns herself with her daily life and meditating upon it

whatever method you use to find your own connection is a good thing that's why i don't mean it as a slur when i point out that one collection of writings and other writings that were not included does not intrinsically make them incompatible with the Word of God

i personally couldn't read Daniel after i got to the part where it was clear daniel arranged nebuchanezzar's assassination however, that really disturbed me, as did the mention of the watchers

Nebuchadnezzar's assassination? Where is that from, the Book of Enoch? I've never heard of that.

lol, it's before, i dunno... man, really, you need to read the first part up until the death of nebuchanezzar again, obviously

oof with my mind alert to the toxicity of the vegan cult of today it raised my hackles in so many places that when i got to the death of nebuchanezzar i was done, it was like watching leviathan kill behemoth, an orgy of evil

What are you smoking, my friend? 😄

j/k!

lol, haven't smoked anything since like july last year, would be nice for my cramp condition...

seriously though, you gotta try reading it in the context of understanding the machinations of politics

i hated nebuchanezzar, and i actually hated daniel even more because he was even more conniving and tricky, not just plain narcissistic and inhuman

btw, i managed to chase away that problem and ironically the UHT milk that helped me mostly make it go away, was keeping it happening

literally 3 days now no UHT milk and no cramps either now

and i should add, about 5 months since seed oils, and i've resumed some carbs now but very little, a little bread... anyway, point is it seems very clear that the UHT milk and the seed oils and excess carbs were the multiplicity of factors causing the cramps

and i'd been smoking weed for years to keep that away

years.

I literally can't find anything online about that lol

I believe you mean Belshazzar, not Nebuchadnezzar?

In chapter 5, Daniel revealed that Belshazzar would be murdered when he (with God's help) translated the handwriting on the wall...

There is zero evidence in the text that Daniel was complicit in the murder.

you know of the concept of "subtext" right? also of the idea of "getting the reader to have sympathy with the character"? neither happened for me, i was sus on him from the get go and especially because watchers told him things, like he was being handed the keys to the kingdom by those who decide

for me "watchers" is a red flag word because it almost never appears in the bible meaning good angels, almost always fallen ones

Probably due to my very high view of Scripture, I perceive Daniel to be an honorable man. Consider, for instance, how he refused to compromise his principles to the point of being thrown into a den of hungry lions...😳

That takes considerable moral backbone, something I seriously doubt a murderer posesses.🤔

i will have to try and read it again... if i muddled those identities that may change my view of it