In the end, #Bitcoin will fix itself
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=673x481&blurhash=rbH2%2Bq%25%24JDM%7BnhxtNGbcn%24%3Fws.oekBaybIWBofWCJDRiMxt7flRks%3AoeR*E2NHjZkDf%2Bj%3FWCWBfkxYRjoebcNIoJofaebH%24%24ocxtadaKWXozodWB&x=c748b592504a019bd63980fd8a2c70e1a0cd7bca822bbd5ea480c766498e4315
To an extent, I agree. There is a definitely a nature-like mechanism to Bitcoin's timechain.
But I also think we shouldn't let ourselves become complacent. I think that's what happened with the centralisation of LN and in general any entertained L2 solutions/proposals.
I don't think the #LN is anymore "centralized" than #Bitcoin mining. I'm able to spin a new node up, open a channel, send #sats across the network to another #NodeRunner and nobody is able to stop the payment from happening.
That's true, it HAS remained accessible throughout, and tools for the ease of channel management are being developed.
I suppose as I've been triggered lately by seeing a lot of software that people flock to, which only allows centralised nodes and promotes centralisation of users' funds. Prime example being the Primal client on web which I ended up leaving.
This will always be the case. The majority of people will take the easy path and use a custodian. The only way to learn will be rugpulls. Expensive lessons are working wonders.
