Depends on how you intend to use the bitcoin you're transferring from Alby. Do you want keep in a lightning wallet for use with Nostr (zap)? Or do you want it in a non-custodial on-chain wallet?
If you want to use Lightning, your best bet is probably Muun, Breez, or LifPay. Those wallets are primarily lightning, but can also send and receive on-chain. Lifpay also has NWC and provides an LNURL, so it's immediately compatible with Nostr.
Muun and Breez don't provide an LNURL or have NWC, only standard lightning invoices. Zeus is good if you want to run a full lightning node, and also provides an LNURL and is NWC compatible. Finally, if you want something lightning only that provides an LNURL, and is NWC compatible, I recommend Minibits.
You should be able to transfer your funds from Alby into any of the wallets I've mentioned.
If you prefer to stay on-chain, my main recommendation is Nunchuk Wallet. As a secondary option, I suggest Blue Wallet.
That's a awesome overview. Should bookmark. I think I may actually want to stay off chain... Does my question become obsolete regarding fees then?
Well, fees are involved with all lightning wallets. Minibits are very low, like 2%. Muun and Breez are a bit higher, and their fees for sending on-chain transactions are sorta high. If you just want to stick with Lightning, go with Minibits or LifPay. Both have low fees, and excellent compatibility with Nostr. You could also go with Coinos.io, which is a web-based wallet that supports lightning and on-chain transactions. And it also provides an LNURL and is NWC compatible. It's really up to you. Try them all and see which one you like best.
Yes, absolutely. Thanks for digging deeper and sharing more of your knowledge ๐๐๐ป
I have actually been thinking I want to consolidate and move things from various places onto bitkey. Would you agree it's best to send to the wallet I'd be transferring to bitkey even if it's not lightening so it's all together? Or perhaps I'd send direct to bitkey? I actually haven't dove into bitkey yet so I am still unfamiliar as to how it works and how many wallets etc I can bring into it. But been leaning on wanting to narrow down to having sats in less places.
I think maintaining a lightning wallet and a seperate on-chain wallet makes the most sense. You keep 50k sats in your lightning wallet, for zaps and lightning payments, and the rest you keep in your on-chain wallet. That's your savings. And you can move sats from your lightning wallet to your on-chain wallet when it has accumulated a certain amount. This way, you're keeping enough sats to zap others and pay any expenses you may have, while adding to your on-chain savings on a regular basis. And if you're making monthly purchases of bitcoin, those go to your on-chain wallet.
Iโm still on the fence about Liquid as an option to use Lightning for payments without maintaining channels. I was not a fan earlier in the year until I started seeing some of the things being built with the nostr:npub1jugar2agq6369p0l86razavs9shj2p6pscxecevs8j94ap37hkqsjlfc28 SDK and itโs growing on me. Itโs not as fast as Lightning but itโs also much easier for the average user to onboard onto one of these wallets. Itโs not a perfect solution, but neither is ecash, because of the custodial risk.
For most purposes, keeping small balances under $100 USD value on any hot wallet makes the most sense.
I haven't seen a lot of places that actually accept Liquid. A few wallets support Liquid, including Coinos, and Aqua Wallet, but I can't remember the last time I ran into a merchant that accepted it. I think Lightning is more practical, and better supported. And if you're running a wallet that demands running your own node, I think the fees are reasonable.
I think the whole deal with maintaining lightning channels is an unnecessary pain in the ass. Wallets like Breez manage the channels for you in the background, and with no intervention necessary. I think a solution like that is better than running your own node, such as it is with Zeus. I'd rather just have the wallet deal with that in the background.
I suppose it does depend on how much you're transacting, but for facilitating zaps and making a few payments each month, I just don't see the value in getting involved with opening and closing, and rebalancing channels. I think Breez is much more efficient and user-friendly option. Or even a custodial option like LifPay, or a pseudo-custodial option like Minibits. The only issue with Breez is that it doesn't support NWC, or provide a lightning address. That means it's worthless for use with Nostr. You'd have to run a separate wallet like Minibits, Coinos.io, or LifPay for Nostr compatibility.
You probably didnโt get what I was saying. The new generation of wallets store balances in Liquid but transact over Lightning. This way the user can receive instantly with no syncing and channel management, and merchants can receive payments via the Lightning network. (These are mainly facilitated by nostr:npub1psm37hke2pmxzdzraqe3cjmqs28dv77da74pdx8mtn5a0vegtlas9q8970.)
Are you referring to Breez?
Not the main Breez mobile app but whatโs currently being shipped using their SDK and Greenlight.
Iโve been testing Yopaki for a few weeks and aside from a handful of bugs and UX issues Iโve found that are being fixed, itโs really promising.
https://yopaki.com
Have you checked out Blitz Wallet?
Blitz Wallet โ A self-custodial Bitcoin Lightning, Liquid, and Ecash wallet aiming to simplify payments on the Bitcoin Network.
It's built with the Breez SDK and works with Liquid.
https://blitz-wallet.com/
Not yet but I will. Looks very similar to how Yopaki works. Thanks for sharing. 
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
That Yopaki organization sounds like a bitcoin exchange with some extended functionality, including buying and selling cryptocurrency-related stocks and ETFs. Have you established an account with them? How are ylu using it? Just to buy bitcoin?
No, itโs not an exchange. Itโs just a wallet. There is no KYC needed to use it. Iโve been testing it along with a list of other Lightning and Lightning-enabled wallets to onboard people in New York where KYCโd custodial wallets are not available.
Hmmm... That's interesting. Based on the website, I thought it was an exchange. I'll have to sign up and see what it's all about. I love evaluating new wallets. It's one of my nerd hobbies.
Honestly I never even read their website copy before. It doesnโt describe the app very well! ๐
Yeah, I guess not. No part of their website led me to believe it was a wallet.
Iโll ask the founder Francisco about that next time I talk to him.
I don't even think the word "wallet" is in there. Lol
Itโs on the App Store. I wonder if they pivoted from an earlier business idea and forgot to update the website. ๐
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Yopaki looks indirectly unpleasant for tracking

Most of that probably comes from the purchasing function. Anything that facilitates purchasing typically involves a level of KYC data that I'm always uncomfortable with. Of course, the place I buy coins from, Cash App, also involves a bunch of KYC and transaction data, so I don't know WhatsUp with my inconsistent criteria. Lol I guess since I provided all my data a long time ago, I just forget about it when I'm buying. It's just so easy and fast that I forget that all my information is being attached to every purchase. Oh well ๐คทโโ๏ธ
I get it and understand. Risky to direct newcoiners into a web of connection though. Even though you own the keys to the bitcoin wallet I imagine the app attaches lightning transactions to your app/phone ownership
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
There's a brewery by me that accepts bitcoin with the Aqua Wallet. They take liquid BTC.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Precisely what Coinos.io allows you to do if you master the art of building seedphrase backups.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thank you for the Zaps! Much appreciated! ๐
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
It sounds to me like lifpay is a good option... That can get transfers from minibits and also is in chain. So that's a good medium between zap transfers and onto other places. Am I correct?
Yep... Lifpay provides a LNURL (lightning address) and is NWC compatible for full interoperability with Nostr. And it can send and receive on-chain transactions. So, it would be a good intermediary for moving sats to an on-chain wallet. But you wouldn't want to use it as your on-chain wallet because all your funds would be held on the lightning network in a custodial situation. You can use it to transfer sats to and from your on-chain wallet, which would be a non-custodial option that's preferred for savings.
Gosh ok. Thank you! ๐ This is more complicated than I had realized. But I am glad I am learning. I think I am gonna pick this up tomorrow and make determinations... I was kinda not wanting to download more apps and more wallets and hoped something I already have will work. Which I guess Zeus and muun do work for my purpose to get my zaps off alby and then can go from there with wherever I want them next.
To make it simple...
Pick an on-chain wallet. Nunchuk is great, but is more complex. Blue Wallet is also great, but it's a little more user-friendly. Choose one.
Forget about Minibits. It's a great wallet, but it doesn't support on-chain transfers, which you want. Go with LifPay. It's compatible with Nostr, it provides you a lightning address, and it supports on-chain transfers.
Everything else can be put aside for another day.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
One last thing. You did mention Blue wallet would work. But it doesn't seem like I have a lightening wallet capability with it to receive my Alby funds. Am I missing something?
Thread collapsed