If you donāt see how any of that is relevant, itās no wonder why people here donāt find your content relevant.
Nostr has no algorithm by design, and it doesnāt need one.
Discussion
Every client has to have some algorithm. Most clients have chosen to implement the ādisplay content from follows in chronological orderā algorithm.
Okay, fair, you can call that an āalgorithmā if you want to.
What heās talking about is specifically a ādiscovery algorithm ā
Nostr doesnāt need a ādiscovery algorithmā ļæ¼the whole purpose is to find other based on reposts of others, interactions, lists, and feeds.
Nostr is a protocol, not a product. The purpose is whatever each client decides to build on top of it. Not everyone wants to discover content through a chronological feed. Some people are even experimenting with alternatives to a feed. There will be many clients and algorithms to choose from.
1) did you even check what the post was about?
2) how do you explain this IMENSE discrepency between twitter and nostr?
How can the SAME content be AMAZING on X but suck on NOSTR?
1) yes, I went back a read your original post on both X and Nostr. On X you comment on your own posts as a āthreadā but Nostr uses Article formatting for longer more blog-like posts. If you only using 1 client like Primal, youāre doing it wrong.
2) the discrepancy comes between your immense lack of interactions and engagement on one platform versus your immense need for paying for a blue check to āget seenā on the other platform. Plus you engage more other there.
3) For the same reason that Content can be AMAZING on LinkedIn and suck pretty much everywhere else. ļæ¼
Donāt forget that youāre paying for that āvisibilityā and āengagementā on X.
1) I have 100 other posts that were single post, and the results are the same
2) why do you think I have a lack of interactions? Because there is no discovery algorithm.
Brother, I write things that I want people to see, I am not playing any game!
Itās not a fair comparison at all.
Try the test again from a 2 year old X account and donāt engage with anyone on there; only follow sub 200 people; and donāt use an account with a blue check or 8,000 followers.
Again, if you donāt see how any of what Iāve said is valuable then Iām sorry, I canāt help you.
OMG, you are something else.
Are you deliberately trying not to understand? You clearly understand p2p technology, nostr:nprofile1qqsxr0mepvsfftasxj2uncfk4nmpt0s0enpvh9d44na47mxwlcvtqcspzamhxue69uhkzarvv9ejumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcpr9mhxue69uhkc6t8dp6xu6twvaex2mrp0yhxxmmd9uq3camnwvaz7tmvdank2m3wvf6xxen0wfcxcetzwvhxxmmd9uzcum05 gave you a clear breakdown of what might be causing the differences, and yet you continue to repeat yourself without considering the points.
My only charitable take here is that you are not aware that Nostr is p2p, in that case have a read here: https://nostr.org/. Even after understanding that if you expect Nostr to be exactly like Twitter or whatever else, it's really not for you.
FWIW, I'll give you a follow because I generally liked when I saw your posts on Twitter.
There 2 t options:
1) logen is right, and I am such a idiot and can comprehend the basic things he explained
2) there is a lack of a discovery algorithm
Which one do you think it is?
Futher more what is so wrong in what I am doing.
I put a lot of time in researching Bitcoin topics and writting about them, and I just want to get them in front of some people that are interested in this.
Some how this is wrong, because?
Try posting more about cows and bicycles. I like cows and bicycles.
Or take your t shirt off. Thatās also popular here.
