Yes. But the problem is and always will be who decides what crosses the line and not.

*** to be clear CSAM BAD ***

I think of the people who got the lives ruined because a person or a machine marked content that was mistakenly selected. If an npub gets publicly listed a pedo because of a mistake a machine or a reviewer made, that's a big deal. However I do understand this number is likely to be much smaller than the number of actual pedos sharing content. Who gets to decide, how does an appeal work. How do we handle reputational damage? How do we handle mistakes (even in code) with a public pedo registry? Do we do it like most western countries handle pedos?

Governments are going to do this if they aren't already, maybe we the despot's do what they were going to do anyway?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

All good questions, I do not have the answers to any of them 🐢🐾🫑

This stuff is always a touchy subject. Where I come from it's either shoot your local pedo, or you're a pedo.

"muh protocols don't kill people"

letting governments run this or government funded operatives is certainty that it will never actually work

the governments are full of pedos

the australian government recently banned publication of a list of pedos that were found by the australian federal police for 75 years

because probably half the government is pedos