This looks cool, I didn’t see anything about reviews in this but will do some research on it.
Thanks for sharing!
There are “reviews” for mints, which set up the reviewers for failure when the rug is pulled.
The marketplace spec has reviews mentioned - https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/99.md - and these make perfect sense for this use case.
cc nostr:npub1xzrkzsrnr83vn7h0udq6tnapwpswy5equlrtkn3nu0e0anlmzynqne0qap nostr:npub1equrmqway3qxw3dkssymusxkwgwrqypfgeqx0lx9pgjam7gnj4ysaqhkj6 nostr:npub16dhgpql60vmd4mnydjut87vla23a38j689jssaqlqqlzrtqtd0kqex0nkq
Discussion
Check the spec linked in the nip above: https://github.com/GammaMarkets/market-spec/blob/main/spec.md
Section 5 is reviews
5. Product Reviews (Kind: 31555)
Product reviews follow NIP-85 and QTS guidelines with additional marketplace-specific rating criteria. Reviews provide structured feedback about products, merchants, and the overall purchase experience.
Content: Detailed review text
Required tags:
d: Reference to product ["d", "a:30402:
rating: Primary rating ["rating", "
score: 0 (negative) to 1 (positive)
"thumb" label MUST be present as primary rating
Optional tags:
Additional Ratings:
rating: Category scores ["rating", "
score: 0 to 1 (supports fractional values)
category: These are optional, some standard categories may include:
"value": Price vs quality
"quality": Product quality
"delivery": Shipping experience
"communication": Merchant responsiveness
{
"kind": 31555,
"created_at":
"tags": [
// Required tags
["d", "a:30402:
["rating", "1", "thumb"], // Primary rating
// Optional rating categories
["rating", "0.8", "value"],
["rating", "1.0", "quality"],
["rating", "0.6", "delivery"],
["rating", "0.9", "communication"]
],
"content": "Detailed review text"
}