“Where would you put your wealth if not the dollar?”

Chamath’s recent rant on All-In on relativism and the United States’ dominance comes with a blind spot.

In a multi-polar world smart governments will opt for an apolitical money that can’t be weaponized or debased to store wealth; bitcoin.

The last two years have proven that the US will weaponize the dollar as soon as it deems it necessary. No matter how strong the US is relative to all other countries the ability to cut others off from the dollar will force other countries to seek alternatives.

The BRICS+ currency, if it ever materializes, will fail rather quickly. There may be a somewhat stable honeymoon period that lasts for a short while after it launches but trust will erode between those countries over time. Bitcoin is the only answer. There is no alternative.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Hey give Chamath a break for missing the point he’s been head down hard at work scheming up a new shitcoin to fleece retail on in 2024

Respectfully disagree. Your blind spot makes you think this.

Most politicians (aka rulers) want a money they can control and use to continue their reign.

I’m hopeful and believe that bitcoin eventually emerges the winner due to necessity, but I think it’s incorrect to think many politicians will move to it until they have no choice or until it’s politically advantageous for them to do so.

That may take longer than most of us would like.

Maybe a bit of both? If Bitcoin starts gaining value some leaders might start stacking themselves. Game theory gets interesting if there is a "Don't-crush-BTC lobby" influencing government. I think Blackrock ETF is evidence that this is happening. Anything that confuses government response to Bitcoin is bullish. Bitcoin wins if we can maintain status quo.

Chamath is obnoxious. Friedberg and Sacks make that show.

VC's who love to play poker, make a podcast called "All In" where the intro is cards and poker chips. You don't go to this place to get truth. Every minute of that show is them trying to influence the world around them to their advantage. Maybe at times your interests align with theirs, but that is the best you can hope for.

Trying to explain this to my no-coiner friends and seeing their brains seize up is oh so tiresome.

nostr:npub1s5yq6wadwrxde4lhfs56gn64hwzuhnfa6r9mj476r5s4hkunzgzqrs6q7

Explaining the net exporters vs. net importers dilemma seems to be the best framing for them to grasp, though.

I believe nation states that aspire to empire will choose gold. They really want to issue fiat currency again and going back to a "gold standard" will allow them to eventually do this. The real question should be: what will producers of irreplaceable goods demand in payment?