The storage is expensive. This is why spammers want to remove filters, which makes it even more costly, so nobody other than them can run a node and turn us into Ethereum and Solana.

The storage is expensive. This is why spammers want to remove filters, which makes it even more costly, so nobody other than them can run a node and turn us into Ethereum and Solana.

Bro who the fuck runs a node like this?
I think it's costing me a few bucks a year to run my node 🙃.
What is your setup?
A laptop with core running on it.
How much does this laptop cost? How much is your internet bill? My response was to nostr:nprofile1qyv8wumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wsq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgqgzx3h claiming "anyone can spin up a shit ton of nodes relatively cheaply" can you spin up a shit ton of this laptop cheaply?
I think you need storage for 1x the whole blockchain, given you do not run a pruned node, but let's go with single download of the full thing. After that you could share the storage, spin up vm's at any cloudprovider that have ideal mem-cpu combinations to run as many nodes on a single machine as possible and then you repeat that. You could symlink all files in the blockchain to it and this way have 100-200 nodes for less than $50 a month i think. Probably cheaper.
You can mount the raw block files (blk*/rev*) in a single read‑only --blocksdir, but LevelDB’s chainstate is read‑write and lock‑protected, so every extra node still needs its own 10–12 GB chainstate, its peers/mempool logs, about 250–350 MB of RAM, and a slice of CPU for validation; scale that by 100 and you’re looking at roughly 1.2 TB of fast SSD, 25–35 GB of RAM, sustained high IOPS, and near‑gigabit bandwidth—resources that push a real‑world cloud bill into the hundreds of dollars per month, well beyond the “$50 for 100–200 fully validating nodes” target.
Tbh I didn't even read the OP, just your comment - you make a solid point 🙃
And you are a solid person, my friend