Replying to Avatar ChipTuner

The difficult part with "privacy" based forks is they focus on keeping as much convenience as they can. I don't need or want convenience, I need less surface area. I don't want HID or serial port access, I've never needed and never will. I don't need or want web filesystem support. Stuff like that. I want a fork where that code is completely removed.
Avatar
Matt 6mo ago

I'm not sure how complex it would be, but I'd like a bare bones browser that can have components added like a plugin if desired. I don't need or want a lot of shit in browsers. Probably a lot more stuff than I'm even aware of.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
ChipTuner 6mo ago

Agreed. I think I spend more time turning shit off, or adding extensions to turn shit off than I do actually using these features.