Nostr Web Client

Yeah. Right now, I personally can't trust the chromium codebase. There are still too many features I don't know how to turn off (or ensure are turned off) that Mozilla explicitly refuses to implement for privacy reasons. I wish Forks of Firefox were able to keep up with the bugs so this didn't happen, but yeah.

ChipTuner 6mo ago

The difficult part with "privacy" based forks is they focus on keeping as much convenience as they can. I don't need or want convenience, I need less surface area. I don't want HID or serial port access, I've never needed and never will. I don't need or want web filesystem support. Stuff like that. I want a fork where that code is completely removed.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Matt 6mo ago

I'm not sure how complex it would be, but I'd like a bare bones browser that can have components added like a plugin if desired. I don't need or want a lot of shit in browsers. Probably a lot more stuff than I'm even aware of.

ChipTuner 6mo ago

Agreed. I think I spend more time turning shit off, or adding extensions to turn shit off than I do actually using these features.