shocker, publishing a chrome extension requires all kinds of reviewing bullshit...

fucking walled gardens... 😐

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yup, including a better name.

I think I've got it... check DMs

Browser extensions, apps, gate keepers everywhere. What is the way around all of this? 👀

someone should do something

😂

ðŸŋ

exactly what I'd say

What will it be called? 👀 It's an exciting time to be alive ðŸĪĐ

Basically sideloading

Worst part was the $5, otherwise idc really. Or so I thought until they started rejecting my extension and only gave template responses as to why (which is their policy). Fixed that by adding `useless.html` with `chrome.` api usages that my extension was asking permissions for. Turns out reviewing minified code isn't so simple ðŸĪŠ

And lots of obviously evil extensions seem to make it through anyway lol