Yes yes I misspoke about how I can see all your follower's transactions, when I clearly meant all transactions notifying your paynym. You knew the mistake I made and tried to catch me on this to minimize and deflect from the core issue, which is that *I can see all notification txs to your paynym.
Discussion
Then show me one notification tx to my paynym. Just one. Or even how many notification txs. Back up your claim.
PM8TJSWfiWT4oV3soqgy9X27FRHuMDK7Lk9mPiJTesfoxYYEyorkhTQCzk1V2a57Hdr4U4idJ6XntDK78D4EPMHgYWKg44bTUfPBDo9xfZYykixa1Hk7
Ugh. Fine. I'll do it later.
Bull shit you CANNOT. I’ll be waiting please come back
Ah interesting claim. OK.
It's facts. Quit spreading lies. Ignorant dumbass.
Err do you want to bet on this? Could give me a stronger incentive to check.
yes how much? 0.1?
I'm poor, that's too much for me to wager.
How about this: if I can identify all on chain *notification* transactions you've received to your Paynym (there must be >0 as of block 778,170), you send me 0.5 XMR.
If not, I send you whatever the equivalent is in BTC.
I have 1 week to do this (until block 779,178).
The Paynm I'll check is:
PM8TJSWfiWT4oV3soqgy9X27FRHuMDK7Lk9mPiJTesfoxYYEyorkhTQCzk1V2a57Hdr4U4idJ6XntDK78D4EPMHgYWKg44bTUfPBDo9xfZYykixa1Hk7
To prove your side, you have to share 1 on chain notification transaction you've received that I didn't identify.
If you share a transaction I wasn't able to identify and I see the reason why I didn't identify it, and can prove that I am able to identify all transactions like it, then it's a push. I have 24 hours to prove this after you share this transaction.
The bet only applies to v1 and v2 Paynyms as spec'd here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0047.mediawiki#protocol
Deal.
PM8TJSWfiWT4oV3soqgy9X27FRHuMDK7Lk9mPiJTesfoxYYEyorkhTQCzk1V2a57Hdr4U4idJ6XntDK78D4EPMHgYWKg44bTUfPBDo9xfZYykixa1Hk7
This payment code's notification address is 133Jwmk4VKhMHU54uLhQFmcKMr25m7C67u
It's received 1 notification transaction:
d01be9f14e6c7d99dbbeeff9c043a964d6a25ad343fdee5dbdb17cc97926f015
Question for you: let's say I'm offline disconnected from the chain. I share my payment code with you and Bob. You and Bob both send the notification transaction on chain. Is your claim that Bob wouldn't be able to identify your notification transaction?
PM8TJP7RYWNosUvkvj6zoV6QwhJLfQWc4fhVsp7ZWq1WR3HU3f4uUk2yuefEedzF97QMhcPfdphZEXyhWanh6ZgPUDVPmxjW9j51Wt2zHwgPvKVkdqxR
This payment code's notification address is 1EF3jhLtmTK2iLzQwtMWTGgABuoogS679T
It's received 4 notification transactions:
85339c4a7fb217e60811ce1caa00a9e619dd88fa553150b1cff1c5d0c3d02a2b
06a069c99e4e3f3fb07014710ec45a7d4db5929a2f7a41c2d6d3076b32e81f0c
bd0c62b4fd23d28a74e554c3f93093fab1eb6586f90f925c05b8fb37350e6c28
b9e72c22a2db111c12a74b178185f738e0a1cc6b6523288dd55035c3f8f3b531
#[3]
Good job you can see the notification tx incoming to a PayNym. Doesn't link to subsequent payments though. Tx connects to a PayNym since they pay to the PayNym notif address. But the addresses derived from that connection can not be found out. You need to do #[5]
That’s not his paynym code.
Thank you for telling me what I clearly already know and have been saying this whole time. Did you know this was the case with Paynyms or did you just find out?