Transitioning to an entirely cashless society will only serve to make the poor and marginalized more dependent on the government.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So, then don't stop pestering the normies with economic education, no matter how much they hate it.

And devise multiple methods of bitcoin preservation.

Unless Bitcoin can be transferred via some physical medium, it's going to be inaccessible to those who are already disadvantaged.

It can.

Than don't become one of the disadvantaged.

Why is this matter a concern to you?

Because I care about those who are less well-off than myself.

Look, lad. They'll always be there. Lol. What have you achieved in changing related circumstances?

Also, they choose to ignore alternative methods of wealth preservation and growth. And the living conditions of the poor should not be of precedence to you. Sorry, but it is true.

Duh. The goal is to push everyone onto UBI then control what they can and can't spend money on.

Dependency = control

Yup. I still think a non-electronic value exchange is still required

going cashless will break the social net, formal and informal, for millions in the US.

And those unable to find a way to trade without the permission of the government will learn about natural selection the hard way. So read and learn mutafukkas!