“The compromise is some innocent people will be wronged” … i’m gonna hope you misspoke here because if not, fucking gross dude.

Same energy as “privacy tools should be banned so we can better catch criminals, some innocent people will be wronged but overall it will decrease crime”.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Completely agree. Wanted to zap you but you don't have a wallet yet so just liked and replied to say so.

The fact we put anyone in jail, or deport anyone at all, is obviously a compromise because any legal system will make mistakes. You're just being absolutist in a ridiculous, obviously counterproductive way.

I’m not absolutist, I’d rather the compromise be “the legal system made a mistake” than what you’re advocating for which is bypassing the legal system entirely.

If the legal system makes a mistake there is at least a path to fixing the mistake. If there aren’t enough judges or lawyers and it takes too long, the legal system needs to be changed.

Its like you’re creating different classes of people. Some people have rights, others don’t?

Rounding up and deporting people en masse seems like a very dangerous precedent to set. Hopefully the next administration doesn’t decide you and I are environmental terrorists because we use bitcoin, and we belong in a foreign prison.