Only at war. That collectivism is really coercion and theft. It crowds out market activity. But markets are the opposite of war, and war is the state's business, so the real purpose of collectivism is to do war.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Maybe šŸ¤”. The word ā€œUnitedā€ is firmly planted in the name of the ā€œUSā€, even the acronym is a call to collectivism. I see there are much more gains beyond the defense against war value statement. I can’t argue against the fact that it facilitates trade with less friction amongst the trusted members. The speed limit of business in the ā€œfreeā€ market is ā€œcapital-Tā€ Trust. We don’t want to go slower than that speed limit, but definitely don’t go faster.

There should be no distinction between commerce with people in other states in the union vs trade with people in states outside the union.

I agree. The speed limit is the same amongst individuals: capital-T Trust. We’re building infrastructure to help us verify, relying less on trust. So that’s why I am here on nostr šŸ™‚

I would add that the global earth is still a ā€œcollectiveā€ by definition. Just ā€œzoom outā€ they say. It’s just another 🐢.

Yeahhhhh but... Do water molecules care if the glass is a collective?

The glass might care šŸ˜„ and I am not sure if molecules have feelings. You should write about that metaphysics one of these days.

Just read Sheldrake, he's got it covered

I don’t know who that is.

Rupert Sheldrake. Used to pal around with McKenna... Of the Terrence variety. Talks about morphic resonance.

Ah, yet another reference to the allegory of the cave.

ā€œBad religion is arrogant, self-righteous, dogmatic and intolerant. And so is bad science. But unlike religious fundamentalists, scientific fundamentalists do not realize that their opinions are based on faith.ā€

Nice find.

Did he say that? That's great

The idea that we’re part of a collective memory makes sense. All this impulsive reaction to words like ā€œcommunismā€ or ā€œcapitalismā€ or ā€œauthoritarianismā€. We may not know the words, yet we feel it ā€œa prioriā€.