SMTP and POP are hard to set up .. thus centralised Gmail etc .. nostr frees it ..
Also anti spam angle .. charge a sat per message .. access through any client ..
SMTP and POP are hard to set up .. thus centralised Gmail etc .. nostr frees it ..
Also anti spam angle .. charge a sat per message .. access through any client ..
Great points. ty.
Id love an email client with a zap threshold to filter all the horse shit and im sure im not the only one.
Would the sat "postage" go to the recipent or relay? I think it would also benefit from a bridge to legacy email with a mechanism to add the postage on inbound mail. Maybe LNURL in the header? Outbound messages could include return postage for real conversations that you want a reply to.
To the relay .. the value is in holding the information. Clients would earn through value added service ( better display + more devices ) . Recipient gets the benefit of using the tool .
Bridging to the existing clients is an intermediary steps .. existing providers ( Gmail , Microsoft) would be forced to adapt if they want to keep their clout .. I guess nostr developers should least worry about this piece for one - it is hard to develop for all the email clients ..and second it would add to the mess ..and third the benefits wouldn't contrast clearly ..