All of them.

Every generation thinks it’s not them. 😂

In italy boomers for sure

boomers

C'mon, you know the answer. Boomer women even more. Can't stand those Karens.

Boomers

Boomers

None. They have all just had different challenges

Millennials

Were perfectly positioned to take advantage of internet tech

Gen B

Boomers/ early Gen X.

It’s the generation that’s both at the realm of political power AND refuses to understand how the internet protocol actually works.

You can’t blame zoomers for the world they were born into.

Late genexers and millenials are working to turn things around.

Tie between younger 2/3 of Boomers & younger half of millennials.

I’m a young Xer (1980), btw.

Boomers - had most things handed to them, yet wanted to larp a revolution and destroy the works of their fathers. Now they refuse to die, while leeching off the younger generations whose lives they've fucked over through the fiat system. So yeah, boomers for sure.

I would think that you would have to qualify that question with a category or two. Do you mean economically, medically, educationally, work ethic expectations, general scope of choice?

Boomers. A house cost $20k, a car $3k. That car was built to last forever as were the appliances. They also had the post war fervor and building America to push them along. They are also the ones with the massive net worths saved from that time period. BUT they are all dying off now so likely it is us the Gen Xers that are bequeathed the entitlement. Seems in all this wealth == entitled for the most part.

Perspective. Life easier with all the modern technology and informaion speed. Boomers and gen X might say the opposite. Also depends on country

Which will have a longer lasting impact on the future and quality of life?

The one who didn't have to care about nothing, only their own life.

So none.

Because it is not a generation purpose but an individual one.

Poor can be boomers, gen x, millennials or zoomers. As richs can too.

Money is not all, but it help to have an "easier life".

Boomers. They were able to buy houses for cheap!

Boomers and it's not even close. Housing was retardedly cheap. They didn't need a college education to get a middle class job. And they weren't really hard workers. Read about the unions they formed and how they coerced businesses to pay them more for braindead easy jobs.

Boomers. Its mostly been easy mode for them. As a Millennial, I can say we were definitely coddled and entitled from birth, but everything after has been a series of kicks to the dick. We're basically spiritual Boomers that have been deprived easy mode. I feel bad for the Zoomers though...

They were all hard if you lived the low middle class to poor income groups.

1. 😎😎😎😎

boo! to the boomers

Generation Alpha

Boomers have had it easiest since we had the relatively soundest money at the start of our careers. But entitlement is uniquely different from easiest circumstances. We had a favorable money system but worked very hard and I don’t see that level of drive in the mainstream today who expect value without creating value. That’s why I love #nostr and the emphasis on value for value

i feel like boomers may have had it the easiest financially, but entitlement has been going up steadily with each generation.

source? trust me bro

Boomers, all the way.

The same ones who wanted to go back to office to keep on having affairs with their coworkers.

Nostr, beware of questions like these...

What is the true intent of this question?

As humanity we are called to come together, doesn't matter when you were born. Let's come together, connect and build. Everyone has their struggles, everyone has their priviliges.

To summarize a whole generation as "entitled" is toxic as fuck.

Sorry not sorry

I would echo Peter's comment that was posted about 1½ hr. prior to mine.

I qualify for Boomer membership, but only by dint of my birth year. I actually never truly tasted the alleged, glorious benefits of being a "Boomer". Due to a bad start that coincided with my own country entering into a multi-decade transition, I suffered many hardships, trials, and tribulations, and didn't start to "make it" until my early 40s.

To be frank, the only places I've seen a convincing and consistent display of Boomer "good fortune" has been California, the New England States, perhaps Florida, and of course London. My own birth region went into economic decline soon after Edward Heath took the U.K. into the European Communities (1973).

To try to paint one artificially-formed (or arbitrary) generational grouping as having an easier life compared to some other arbitrary grouping serves no useful purpose except to encourage discord and resentment between younger and older folk ... to the benefit of our collective enemies.

Every generation (however you seek to define them) gets to suffer its unique hardships, and it's unique good fortunes. There's nothing to be done to change that. It's just the way life pans out.

I was once young and virile; just like the 25 year old males of today (mostly) are. We all take our turn. And we can't afford to try and apportion blame upon someone else just because he/she allegedly belongs to some other generation that only actually exists on Social Media, or some Netflix production.

I know what walker is attempting here. And that's fine. In some respects, one could argue it's a worthy poll question to put before Primal / Nostr members. On the other hand one could also reasonably argue it is too risky simply because such questioning invites emotional and ill-informed responses.

We need to focus on building community and encouraging mutual respect between the young and the old, and with the old and the young. Whichever direction you want to put it.

Let's chill out on this one. No need to delete the question. I personally thank walker for posting it. But we need to be clear. We are in the midst of a massive global transition, while living on the cusp of a huge war of potentially global proportions. This is not a good time to be contemplating our generational differences.

If we can't grow into a "Multi-Generational Band of Brothers" ... then we will surely risk degenerating into a resentful rabble of ageist squabblers.