Nostr Web Client

I didn't know Charlie Kirk was a POTUS contender. And he probably wasn't. Some people wanted him to be. Some people thought he might be. But he never stated that he wanted to be a contender. No super PACs were formed. Nothing in his organization pointed that he was running.

(Regarding Biden, I don't know)

If we will define as a contender anyone who's name was mentioned as a possible candidate, half of the US are possible candidates.

Josephus 1mo ago

TPUSA was quite possibly the most consequential organization for zoomers being MAGA of all. TPUSA functionally WAS a super pac and also played around with all the same mega media donors.

No, Charlie didn’t announce. But trump, himself, was an “out of the blue” candidate that almost no one saw coming when he ran. And Charlie was FAR more politically important and involved that pre-2015 trump was. Before 2015, all trump did politically is bluster about obama’s birth certificate (which we still didn’t get by the way).

Charlie also wasn’t legally eligible by age yet. He died at 31. So, of course he didn’t announce. But he had all the makings and made a huge impact with his org regardless.

Every take of yours has been so disingenuous at this point that I have to assume it is deliberate now. Sheinbaum, someone that does not represent the general demographic of the country, miraculously becomes President in an election with multiple assassinations… “but akshually”… I liken it to Charlie Kirk being struck from prominence as a future POTUS hopeful… “but akshually”

And you’re not even right and are side-stepping critical points in the argument/analogy.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Peace K 🪙 1mo ago

Disingenuous?

You claim that Sheinbaum was elected after 14 of he openents were murdered. I point out that that claim is factual false.

What do you do? You move the goal post. It's not that her openents were murdered, potential candidates were murdered.

You try to equivalent it to Charlie Kirks murder. And in doing tha, instead of proving your point you prove my point. Because Charlie Kirk was not a candidate. He was not murdered because he was running for president (as you pointed out he was not even eligible to be a candidate).

You want me to stop side stepping other criticale points in your argument? How about your claim that she came out of nowhere? She was the governor of Mexico city and before that a mayor of a borough in Mexico city. Not exactly out of nowhere.

Not everything is a conspiracy. Sometimes people vote for "free" stuff not understanding the real price they will pay.