Disingenuous?

You claim that Sheinbaum was elected after 14 of he openents were murdered. I point out that that claim is factual false.

What do you do? You move the goal post. It's not that her openents were murdered, potential candidates were murdered.

You try to equivalent it to Charlie Kirks murder. And in doing tha, instead of proving your point you prove my point. Because Charlie Kirk was not a candidate. He was not murdered because he was running for president (as you pointed out he was not even eligible to be a candidate).

You want me to stop side stepping other criticale points in your argument? How about your claim that she came out of nowhere? She was the governor of Mexico city and before that a mayor of a borough in Mexico city. Not exactly out of nowhere.

Not everything is a conspiracy. Sometimes people vote for "free" stuff not understanding the real price they will pay.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.