No human has ever seen what the world really looks like. We've only seen how bundles of neurons make sense of the electrical impulses from the photons hitting the back of our retina, sending signals down the optic nerve.

If you saw the world the way it looks in totality, when you looked up in the night sky, you wouldn't see blackness. If your eyes were sensitive to infrared light, radio frequencies, microwaves, ultraviolet and the entire electromagnetic spectrum, you'd see a universe glowing brilliantly above you. Yet we see but a tiny sliver of what we call "visible light".

It is strange that our intuition is that the human eye is the gold standard for visual perception of reality, when it sees so little of it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If you're so certain you know what is true about the world, and if you're so certain you know exactly what is wrong with the world, and you're so certain you know exactly what to do to fix it, from behind your sensory and informationally impoverished singular viewpoint, then you are out of touch with your own limitations.

When I think I'm starting to believe I know all the answers, I remind myself of this.

So true, but then again we do know some stuff really well.

We build airplanes and they fly.

This isn't a denial of the existence of knowledge.

Quant je vous lis, avec tous les feedbacks que vous recevez en retour, j'ai un sentiment de contacter un grand delta entre ce que vous formulez, si analysé, puis certains feed-back la plupart du part, n'avez-vous pas l'impression (ou cette sentiment) d'être un état de frustration presque plus proche de la mélancolie au regard de tous ceux qui environnent ...Vous devriez poser vos pensées sur un bouquin même si vous êtes dans la technologie. Je revois des classiques dans vos notes postes, tweets qu'importe le nom qu'on leur attribue. 🙏 Rares sont les moments où j,y réponds la lecture et l'analyse me suffisent largement. Merci

We dont even see the full spectrum of colours, just red, blue and green mixed together

Some turtles can see 5 colours

The Case Against Reality: How Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes was a fun read on this topic. Was going to say eye opening, but that seems wrong somehow in this context :)

#bookstr ⬆️

And that even assumes a fairly classical interpretation of physics. It only gets weirder when we consider the larger reality.

Latest ep of making sense is on exactly this topic

Seems that you are fully into cartesian epistemology

Is it strange, considering all of our other perspectives :)

And then you have dreams and LSD showing that the brain itself can both completely author reality during sleep as well as be tweaked to perceive conscious reality in novel ways. Fascinating stuff for sure.

Not only that but we only see human reality, the version that has been tuned for our evolutionary fitness. Organisms that see reality more clearly tend not to survive for long. All of our intuitions quite literally revolve around fucking and eating.

The world itself is not capable of showing itself visually in any other way.

"Visually" is a word that is human centric and refers to what the human eye can see. But even among animals, there are species that can see different spectrums spectrums of light. Snakes and bats can see in the infrared spectrum, for instance. Dragonflies have a much wider gamut of visual perception, through the human visible spectrum and into the ultraviolet.

So I would argue that yes, the world can be seen in other ways.

If you think about it, all science and technology provides is an extension to our anemic human senses.

It does!

same goes for sound. and touch. really wild to consider.