"If you searCh: mONErO BUg"

How out of date are those searches I wonder? And let me guess about any recent ones. It was an increase in probability. On only one layer of Monero's privacy. In a specific scenario.

How about this search:

https://bitcoincore.org/en/2018/09/20/notice/

Throws into question all the claims of transparent auditability like it's some impenetrable force field. Where all of bitcoins fate rested on one lone anon secretly divulging an inflation bug to devs who couldve also chosen to covertly exploit it. And you would be none the wiser until it was too late! There is no solution for an inflated exploit bug without hurting users who now hold "fake" Bitcoin they recieved for real products and services. And the shaken credability to Bitcoin would also be catastrophic.

Bitcoin relies on luck more than you or any maxi would like to admit.

Yet, you still hold #Bitcoin because deep down you know the bug would get discovered much faster than on the constantly hardforking shirtcoin, retard.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Discovering a bug is useless after it has been exploited, smoothy

Are you seriously this retarded?

Will the inflation bug be discovered sooner on #Bitcoin or the constantly hardforking shirtcoin or yours?

Be honest, retard.

You should be more gentle when dealing logically incompetent morons. ๐Ÿ˜‚

Yes, sooner, but that wasn't my argument, stick to the topic.

What good is discovering a bug when there is now fake Bitcoin that was exchanged for real goods and services?

1) Rollback: You throw all those merchants/users under the bus who just gave away real products and services for free. Catastrophic for user confidence.

2) Keep the inflated Bitcoin: 21 milion Bitcoin is no longer a meme. Catastrophic for user confidence.

'What good is discovering a bug'?

Use your brain, retard.

Ok, you have now discovered a bug. Your choices or now either option 1 or 2 spelled out above. Which one "solves" the problem? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Discovered bug and dealing with the issue straight away is better than NOT discovering the bug and using the blockchain.

But you still don't get it because you're retarded enough thinking any shirtcoin, using less coins is more scarce than #Bitcoin

Yes, but how did transparency save you from the exploited inflation bug after the fact? Answer: it didn't

Good job you stopped inflation now there are 27 million Bitcoin ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘

If you think Monero, but *especially* Bitcoin with it's "absolute scarcity* meme, wouldn't be forever tarnished and tank after that you are dreaming. Outcome is the same.

The bug will be discovered seconds after the fake coins are created. #Bitcoin will fork back to the 21M.

What's your issue, retard?

"The bug will be discovered seconds after the fake coins are created"

You are naive. Why would you think this lmao? You think there is an red alert exploit siren? ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ ๐Ÿ˜‚

This could easily go unnoticed for a long time just as the 2018 exploit bug discovered by that anon. An implementation flaw could be telling you there is X amount of coins when in reality there are more. You could have no clue

The implementation flaw where, retard? In my node? In the tens of thousands of #Bitcoin nodes globally? Are they all the same software/version?

How many extra bitcoins there were in 2018?

You do know code isn't perfect and has implementation flaws all the time right? Among all those different versions a large core of the code is the same...I was kidding calling you a smoothy earlier, but now I'm rethinking that ๐Ÿค”

Never said the code is perfect. Having many different versions makes your bug scenario going undiscovered, next to impossible on #Bitcoin.

Something much more likely to happen on the constantly hardforking shirtcoin of yours, retard.

I'm not kidding when I call you a retard. I honestly mean it ๐Ÿค™๐Ÿ’œ

If the core is the same, it's actually way more possible than you suggest.

But if you say so honey ๐Ÿค™๐Ÿงก

The core isn't the same, your shirtcoin is much more likely to experience this scenario, reyard. As I said, I'm not kidding ๐Ÿค™๐Ÿ’œ

You just made my point lmao