As it relates to this most recent election: the appointment of Supreme Court judges by Trump led to the overturn of Roe v Wade.

The people in the pro-choice camp felt this was a great misfortune.

When Harris began her campaign, her campaign strongly ran on the platform to reverse the decision. (Not realistic if you ask me, presidents don’t have that power. But it was the major battle cry for the Harris campaign)

You ask almost any person voting for Harris ( at least this way my experience), and the first thing they would mention was abortion rights.

So, to many, this election was the choice between a pro-choice candidate, or a candidate who denied woman’s bodily rights.

Tl;dr The Harris campaign made it the focal point of the campaign given recent events in the Supreme Court. At least, that way my interpretation of things.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah and they were so ludicrously misled. Like you say, the president doesn't have the power to change it. Additionally, the Supreme Court only denied the guarantee of protecting that right in all states. It did not ban abortion and would not, under the guidance of Thomas Clarence at least. This is something very much lost on the propagandized public. Harris's official platform only said that she would never impose a ban and would reinstate Roe vs. Wade if given the chance, which would not happen whether it was her or Trump, anyway.