Avatar
Sydney Bright
554ab6fed675985d6b99b79ad7b784ff8ca4a5b02778812e1968eee0c6cbc27e
Customer Success at Abundant Mines Author of The Ancient Way of the Mind

This is a great presentation. I try to make a similar point in my book The Ancient Way of The Mind

Couldn’t agree more. Property rights are sacred.

Seems to me there are more and more conversations in Bitcoin that propose a violation of such rights.

As Bitcoin matures and grows, the frequency of people who wish to violate property rights will likely grow as well.

We must always stand up for what’s right.

Seems to me that the oil is a smokescreen. Just like the drug cartel excuse was before. I think this is about something else entirely

I don’t understand what’s so bad about a quantum computer eventually being able to grave rob old addresses.

Such is life. Those that have their keys will upgrade their wallets, and people will have incentives to build quantum computers to grave rob abandoned ones.

Is this referring to the ecash feature? If not, how could I set that up to help people learn and get an easy lightning wallet nostr:nprofile1qqsrf5h4ya83jk8u6t9jgc76h6kalz3plp9vusjpm2ygqgalqhxgp9gpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejsz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmc6w7884 ?

Replying to Avatar Rusty

All non-native non-ionising man-made EMF i.e.

- Microwave frequency

- Radio frequency

- Dirty electricity

- AC Magnetic

- AC Electric

- Blue light

- Flicker

irrespective of their frequency cause harm below our level of perception through mechanisms other than the thermal effects which everyone keeps referring to when they say "it doesn't have enough energy"

The key here is to understand that the mechanism of damage with non-ionising radiation is different from the ionising radiations.

via mechanisms like calcium efflux, intracellular dehydration and increased permeability of the BBB.

Allan Frey in 1960s figured out the link between weakening of Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) & EMF exposure allowing toxins to enter the brain

Perhaps the next question we should ask is

If the blood-brain barrier is vulnerable to serious and on-going damage from wireless exposures, then what about

The blood-ocular barrier (that protects the eyes)

The blood-placenta barrier (that protects the developing fetus)

The blood-gut barrier (which ensures proper digestion and nutrition)

The blood-testes barrier (that protects developing sperm)

to see if they too can be damaged by these wireless radiations?

and if you read report from 29 independent scientists & health experts from around the world who put down an indepth report called "The Bioinitiative Report 2012"

with over 1800+ studies showing bioeffects and adverse health effects of EMF from wires (powerlines, electrical wiring, appliances and hand-held devices) and wireless EMF (cell and cordless phones, cell towers, WI-FI, wireless laptops, wireless routers, baby monitors, surveillance systems, wireless utility meters smart meters, etc.)

When you look at the data,

You will quickly see that when telecom industry funds EMF research

↪ 68% of research showed no effects

↪ Only 32% showed harmful effects

When there was no money from the wireless industry

↪ 70% of studies showed harm

↪ 30% showed no effects

And that funding bias is not a coincidence, it is how they play this game.

If you want to control the narrative, you do not need to control the physics

You just need to control the studies people hear about.

Telecom companies will proudly say

ā€œLook, most studies show no harmā€

while quietly forgetting to mention that they paid for a big chunk of the ā€œno harmā€ pile.

Now zoom out for a moment

We already know:

- The mechanism of injury for non ionising EMF is not about breaking DNA directly like X rays or gamma rays

- It is about disrupting biology

- Messing with signalling

- Messing with voltage gated calcium channels

- Messing with membranes and water structure

- Messing with barriers that are supposed to stay tightly sealed

Once you accept that the thermal argument is outdated

you suddenly see why so many different systems can be affected

Sleep

Mood

Fertility

Cardiovascular system

Blood sugar control

Neurodegeneration

They are all deeply electrical and deeply dependent on timing and membrane integrity.

Now come back to those barriers

If EMF can weaken the blood brain barrier

Why would we assume the blood ocular barrier is magically immune

when the eye is basically an exposed extension of the brain

Why would we assume the blood testes barrier is perfectly safe

when sperm development is already known to be extremely heat and stress sensitive

Why would we assume the blood placenta barrier is untouchable

when it sits between a rapidly developing nervous system and a world full of signals we never evolved with

We have built a civilization that is basically soaking every barrier in chronic fields

and then acting surprised when we see

- Exploding infertility rates

- Earlier and earlier vision problems in kids

- Neurodevelopmental disorders

- Gut issues and ā€œmysteryā€ inflammation everywhere

Instead of asking

ā€œWhat tiny narrow outcome does this one short study show under these carefully controlled artificial conditionsā€

We should be asking

What happens when you stack

- A cell tower 50 meters away

- WiFi in every room

- Bluetooth in your ears

- A phone in your pocket

- Smart meter on the wall

- Dirty electricity on the wiring

- LED & screen blue light in your eyes till midnight

Every single day

for decades

starting in the womb.

That is the real experiment

And NONE of us consented to it.

nostr:nevent1qqsvnv0kwxrh7a3f8fawuj3qd093trwnv2vwj2ampuqjd86vaxgfskgzypx9lapv7qras09zh0thcacg2yfs2sru0l5kaxuqxj3te04yle95yqcyqqqqqqg00dyyn

Would you be willing to leave links to those studies?

I am starting to understand how we are not only beings that absorb and emit light, but the proteins of our body are like semiconductors that allow electrons and energy to flow.

nostr:naddr1qq2nvun8gf8xx36yv3pkxvj8fa68xsjnt9k5kqgewaehxw309ajhxur9d35x7tn8d9exjmn09ehhyee0qgs92j4klmt8txzadwvm0xkhk7z0lr9y5kczw7yp9cvk3mhqcm9uylsrqsqqqa28zrtvwr

ā€ę³•ä»¤ę»‹ē« 

ē›—č“¼å¤šęœ‰

The more laws are posted

The more robbers and thieves there areā€

-老子 é“å¾·ē»

If a coin is secured by less hash power, then it is easier for a state actor (as an example) to come up with enough hashrate to rewrite the chain. The more energy at your disposable, the more capable you are of creating a longer chain and rewriting the networks history.

This has not happened yet, but it’s possible. It is why Bitcoin is so secure. The amount of energy required to rewrite Bitcoin is immense. This isn’t as true for the others.

This is a wonderful article. Thank you for putting it together. Consciousness surely is poorly defined, yet we all vaguely know what it is referring to. That being said, not having a clear definition can make our discussions challenging. In my book, The Ancient Way of the Mind, I choose to define consciousness as the "experience of life". In tandem with exploring the neuroscience of how the brain generates the sense of the self, I use this definition of consciousness to try and distinguish between the experienced self from, what I call, the true Self.

You still have dollars to use as cash?