Yeah, he's arguing for a sort of bio-psychology. Where we learn how agents communicate and incentivize them to have behaviors that are more cohesive to the rest of the larger system. Completely different from "eradicating cancer" as we typically would think of it.
The logic of cancer is that "stress" is something coming from carcinogens, or through rapid recycling like friction forces the cells to become selfish in their behavior because that's their solution to just survive. They're immature cells, defected from the rest of the system and wont "listen", growing without larger consideration.
There are broader ecological and societal implications when you think about that cancer using that framing.
Also AI interfaces for “communicating “ with these intelligent systems. Just ask it to fix problems. Almost sounds insane but it seems possible
That's the real insane part. If the individual cells can communicate up the hierarchy, and the top level understands the incentives of the lower levels to let them do what they do best, the system itself becomes stronger at all levels.
which is ancient knowledge coded into the cells and DNA for millions of years
this artificial bullshit is retarded
we are building neurons not organisms
DNA is material. Puzzle pieces evolved to do what they do best. LIfe and intelligence is something able to use that material to build cohesive and more complex wholes.
You can't reduce life and intelligence to its material cause.
nope, you have to include the entire history of the universe
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
cancers is cells that outlive their DNA's durability, it's that simple
primary mechanism of cancer is poisoning of the halides in the body, iodine is the main cure because it's needed for all cells to do apoptosis
Thread collapsed
