Yes, you are wrong.

My point is you’re saying that and you know absolutely nothing about Kaspa. Making the argument that something will happen just because it has before is silly. You’re guilty of the very thing everybody that laughed at Bitcoin in 2013-2014 were doing. And most people are. They never look to understand, they just assume the position they prefer.

I find it widely ironic you say Kaspa is a BTC wanna be. It further validates you know nothing about it. Kaspa does not want to be Bitcoin. It is the greatest store of value ever and always will be.

People that believe XRP will be used by banks believe in fairy tales. They aren’t objective, serious people.

My point is that nobody on here is objective, HODL included. He said two things about that were wildly inaccurate and the 3rd is very debatable. I just find it ironic that Bitcoiners who had to be either open minded, critical thinkers to get to where they are or sheep in a herd, can’t or won’t objectively look at something. But will be the first to laugh at it and make fun. It’s ironic.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Making the argument that something will happen because it has before is not silly, it's logical in this instance. There's thousands of alts that have their own unique properties that "improve" on Bitcoin and all the other coins out there. People create these coins and employee good marketing tactics. Then they get their own set of users/fans insisting that their coin is the best and will survive & thrive. I remember Dash and Vechain and Nano from 2017 and where are they now? You can call us sheep but I guarantee you that Kaspa will join those coins because those are the odds. You don't know anything about most other coins, are you going to look into every one of them that are suggested to you and be objective? I don't care if you believe that Kaspa is a great coin, it is destined to fail. You've asked Odell and Hodl, now go ask Michael Saylor and get his opinion and tell me he's a sheep too. If we get a huge run up in price this year you should absolutely sell your Kaspa otherwise you will be a bag holder for ever & wish you'd never bought it.

Digital money failed before Bitcoin (eCash, Bitgold, etc). Should nobody have looked objectively at Bitcoin because there was digital money before? Obviously not. And you’re still approaching this as if Kaspa and Bitcoin are in competition, further demonstrating you haven’t looked.

I didn’t call “us” sheep (I already told you I own more Bitcoin than Kaspa and yet you still use us/them language), I said BTCers are either sheep OR they are objective, critical thinkers. Which you are is up to you.

You don’t know what I know about other coins. I have looked at many many many objectively and I can tell you with certainty that Bitcoin and Kaspa are in a class of their own (not placing them in the same class either).

If you don’t want to learn or challenge ideas, that’s fine, but at least make accurate arguments. But this furthers my point. You’re arguing against something you have no idea what it is.