Great project. Let me know if I can help with any QA testing.

Fkin love the fun names

Repo?

nostr:nprofile1qqs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz9thwden5te0dehhxarj9ehhsarj9ejx2a30qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7xph5zr I didn't understand it, but maybe you will.

👀

Do you have a timeliness on when this will be accessible to the public?

I hate to say it but everything I predicted has happened so far. They're now at exploring ecash-powered exchanges and it's is going to be completely bonkers (mark my words)!

An exchange without an order book. Trades happening off-band. Atomic, between users, assets, and even mints. All at light speed, no blockchain bullshit. Think about it.

nostr:nevent1qqsxf9xpddg83nyarq6qw6zdx2a95chyeygf9g2mfwvka53ntq3gchspz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsygrzjspymv9s0t55uy5eckxdyvmhmghdxvnkhjfeyvv66ec87cwaqc89p0v8

What's the risk of 3 letter agencies asking questions? 👀

👀

nostr:nevent1qqsxf9xpddg83nyarq6qw6zdx2a95chyeygf9g2mfwvka53ntq3gchspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygrzjspymv9s0t55uy5eckxdyvmhmghdxvnkhjfeyvv66ec87cwaqcpsgqqqqqqsf3em3h

👀

If I understand this right, Alice and Carol start by swapping their respective currencies fpr ecash. So we have eBtc and eDollars for example.

Exchanges are just mints now? Maybe they make money exclusively on the swap ins and swap outs.

HTLC_c (c for Carol) is a {hash or time} locked so if Carol provides a hash, she can claim it, or if time expires Alice can reclaim it. It is ecash for one side of the trade (e.g. eBtc)

HTLC_a (a for Alice) is the opposite for Alice to claim after a successful trade. It is the other ecash (eDollar)

Details unknown but I'll wait 'till you win the hackathon:

- Uncertain how both Alice and Carol could know the same H: Is it public? Is it on HTLC_c?

- Assuming that verifying a HTLC means checking the signature against the mint's pubkeys.

- Uncertain what subscribing to an HTLC is, but we trust/require the mint to follow a protocol of publishing state changes and preimages. But in the case of a bug or downtime, wouldn't this break atomicity?

If it is atomic and trustless, then hot damn, there are no disputes!!! Only disputes land squarely with the mint to honour swaps.

Very cool!

Great name also

👀👀👀

Boosting for the judges nostr:npub1ze93u0u37u3x0gnfffgxl33k60v7t3afs64jgzf4xznapr4ra5us0u3pxq

nostr:note1vj2vz66s0rxf6xp5qa5y6v46tf3wfjgsj2s4kjuedmfrxkpz330qvc6hf0

What's a 3338 event? What does it look like?

I couldn't find any references to it on the NIP repo's readme. Looks like it is a new proposal.

Good work