if we get drivechains im building one of these, and then hardcoding any WT^ withdrawal votes to my own address (unless i can collude w a big pool) 
nostr:note1zx8w0ea3hyhvhuutr84vv4slacazezynt0ddencj44jjvdgpsvjs03dxrm
Discussion
imagine being a miner and not maximising your revenue EV
based. and you'd still make all the merged miming fees!
you’re not meant to like it 
Miners can steal is good, otherwise it's a blocksize increase.
Stealing is only possible if mining is centralized enough for 51% to agree on where to send the stolen coins. If this is the case it'll be good for thefts to start happening because it'll give the mainchain warning that mining is fucked and you should close all lightning channels with untrusted peers and prepare for high fees.
that makes no sense. unlike every other aspect of mining, collusion should be the default position w BIP300.
if i ran a decent size pool i’d vote for a WT^ transaction that just pays out all pools in proportion to hashrate everytime (for simple steal attempt 1). no offchain coordination required
i guarantee the miner rev FCF from drivechains is never gonna be close to the 2WP custody, never mind the fact it’s a technically seperate thing. and there’s no rational incentive to be honest outside of that.
That's a great point about how obvioue collusion would be. Again, I think miners stealing is good.
I don't agree at all with your second point though. Why would the balance in the 2wp ever be very high? You could instantly swap in, do your zero knowledge coin mixing or prediction market bet, then instantly swap out. Plus, if you think that a drivechain can capture even 10% of the market for monero or zcash transacrion fees (not to mention ethereum) then mm revenue could be pretty nicr for miners.
come-on man that’s the whole point of the BIP. someone’s gotta hold the bag in the end and it’s gonna be the bitcoiner version of LUNA/UST