Nostr Web Client

Untrue imo. These people arent „organizing amongst themselves“, they are organizing against other people - and thats the key difference.

I have no problem with white people who only want to date white people or black people who only want to date black people.

But there is a problem when that convulges with other people are inferior and need to be dominated because they do not share our beliefs/identity/etc.

tree 木 4d ago

Sorry, but you're basically saying it's legitimate to destroy infrastructure based on what people believe (that others are inferior), not what they do. This is pure ideology policing. Who decides when dating preferences "convulge with" beliefs about inferiority?

Many people think certain political ideologies inherently view others as inferior. Communists think capitalists view workers as inferior. Capitalists think communists view individualists as inferior. Religious people think atheists view believers as inferior. Bitcoin maximalists think shitcoiners as inferior. All of these groups "organize against other people". Does any of this justify hacking their infrastructure?

These websites weren't organizing attacks. They weren't planning violence (I really haven't seen any evidence). They were expressing abhorrent opinions in their own corner.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

L0la L33tz 4d ago

I think you havent watched the entire talk on the site‘s founder and the people who were on this app - who base their beliefs on eugenicism (if you dont know what that is, you may want to look that one up).

Equating this to shitcoiners, religion, etc is just nonsene, sorry.

And yes, i do think that communists hacking capitalists who exploit workers is a good thing, just as it is a good thing that capitalists hack communists who want to eliminate individual rights.

That’s not „ideology policing“ - it is supporting the freedom of taking direct action against something you dont believe in, which is a right everyone should have access to in a democracy.

tree 木 4d ago

> the freedom of taking direct action against something you dont believe in

If direct action means pointing it out, explaining it, cursing it, removing these people from your property... then I totally agree. Having a stupid opinion is also freedom. But this goes much further. This was an aggressive attack on someone else's infrastructure, a violation of the non-aggression principle. Basically, the exact behavior we want to fight against.

So I don't see the difference between this and what the NSDAP did in Weimar. If racists were banning Jews from going to their own shops, publicly criticizing them, then ok... But the problem started when they started aggressively using violence to impose this on others.

L0la L33tz 4d ago

*blinks*

Ok then buddy

Comte de Sats Germain 3d ago

You're not one of us, Lola. Based on what you've said here, you have no morals. We're not anarchists to be criminals. Clearly you are.

DagzTagz 3d ago

Correct