It’s not always that the numbers are wrong, it’s normally that the framework that they are assessed with is wrong. That’s how you lie with statistics.

Take for instance your unemployment stat from an earlier post - it’s calculated excluding people who “aren’t actively seeking work” and doesn’t have any regard for the quality, quantity, or type of labor that someone is participating in.

If I have 10M who stop looking for jobs, the unemployment number goes down. But that doesn’t reflect anything positive about the state of the world. Similarly, if everyone has a job but it’s state mandated and doesn’t pay enough to feed your family, then unemployment can be 0% but you’re in a gulag. Do you see what I’m saying?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The only numbers on a screen that I believe are numbers that have been found and validated and are transparent and fully auditable!

EVERY other number is subject to manipulation or mismanagement to enrich, impoverish, control or lie.

Does that mean every other number is fake? No. Does that mean every other number should be met with EXTREME skepticism? Yes.

Believing a number on a screen that has no way of being truly audited and verified is nonsense. Describing it as FACT is naive.

Sperm

🥁

I have no idea what you’re talking about

Besides the math?

🏌️‍♂️

Everyone is pretending they understand but they dont. They cant. They have slices and glimpses and the rest is filled in by wishful thinking, projection and other peoples thoughts. Its not anyones fault. This is what and how we were all taught. The incentives for rapacity are baked in the cake. Just means we cant necassarily trst anyone, even our own future selves. Gotta verify everything that we care about.

Absolutely ?cid=2154d3d77ecfc955fe33ea189bfbb6ae9928248aecd554ed&ep=v1_user_favorites&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

Empire whales . . .