The person who claims that what is inside someone else's body is property of the state is definitely wrong.
Outside of that we're back to my original response to you.
"Objective to some, subjective to others."
Discussion
“The person who claims that what is inside someone else's body is property of the state is definitely wrong.” Absolutely agree. Never argued for that.
But saying you can’t be against abortion because you can’t use your religion in an argument is hypocritical.
I’m all for volunteerism, but does the child volunteer in abortion? Your religion says it isn’t a child and therefore doesn’t have a right to live. Other religions say its a person and therefore its murder. See the impasse?
So I say so what if people from different ideological and religious backgrounds find their own meanings in Bitcoin. Does that not lend to the objective nature of Bitcoin to be able to accomplish something like that?
There is nothing hypocritical about our either of our points,
I personally would never get an abortion, but I think calling someone a murderer who does get one...
Well that's a problem as the laws of nature hold pretty steadfast; mothers know when they are unfit or in an unfit situation.
I don't care what other people do with their lives as long as it doesn't affect mine.
If it takes a bible for you to make every decision in life you're being psyopped - use your intuition - watch nature.
But yes, being anti abortion & supporting politicians who want to ban people from consentualising...that's hypocritical as a bitcoiner.