Hell, gang rape is democracy technically
Discussion
When did politics negate basic human rights? Not even fascism convinced the courts of that.
Are you serious? Were you in a coma from 2020 until 2024? Are you not aware that wars exist? What about forcing poison into infants and calling it medicine? 100% of what the state does violates every basic human right
Mehhh.. fair point. A lot of it, when challenged in court, would likely fail. What bothers me is the rather large component of human support in many of this. Like the huge amount of call-outs for forced vaccination because otherwise "you're endangering someone's grandma". Makes me think that the part that's truly forced is smaller than it may seem. But still, it's fair to state your point as you did.
Well taxation is forced. War is forced. Childhood vaccinations are forced. And those are quite large in their effect.
I don't want to go into every detail, but e.g. the vaccinations as they were used to be made were quite safe. I won't claim that not a single rumor or incident or side-effect was founded, but people dropping by the thousands would certainly be noticed. One could argue that vaccinations could be made mandatory given the known huge beneficial difference between benefits and (very incidental) issues.
However, forcing a known to be novel methodology and technology, with insufficient testing and false communication of efficacy onto a whole population while misrepresenting both the claimed effects and potential risks if not taken, really takes it to a whole new level for me.
I'm talking about all vaccines, especially childhood ones. That is criminal.
The difference between Anthony Fauci and Josef Mengele is just the level of indoctrination you've accepted from government
No vaccine is ever safe and their value is highly questionable. All those success stories of eradicating nasty diseases were not due to vaccines. That is a lie those diseases were eradicated prior to vaccines due to basic sanitation, food safety etc.
Okay, I don't see a point in attacking this because I know too little of either side of the argument. But I want to throw in a different comment:
There should be some initiatives (on various topics) to gather information, sources, quotes/statements, corrections/arguments in some versioned repository (e.g. git). These kinds of data needs to be gathered as a collective and updated/corrected with annotations and references and (archived) documents.
I'm quite serious about this. Same as how the crypto "encryption"/"privacy" debates start every 3-4 years. We should really do the same there. Including archiving prior judgements. But this needs to be approached as a collective. And "curated" for proper procedure or community-sourced approval or something. It would allow for more serious debate and wealth of material for proper communication/argumentation.
This is a great book. Vaccines are quack science.
Varíola foi erradicada por vacinação. Até hoje o molusco contagioso se transmite oi mesmo a varicela. A população humana aumentou por vacinação, sanitarista, cirurgias e antibióticos.
"A man is none the less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years. Neither are a people any the less slaves because permitted periodically to choose new masters." (Lysander Spooner)
