Not necessarily. Remember the MOAB he dropped on Syria in his first term? Nothing came of that.

The embroilment is the embroilment itself. If you believe as I do that he doesn’t want that, then you would see him bombing evacuated sites as not leading to it, but a way to avoid it.

If you believe he’s owned by Israel and wants Iraq 2.0 for the purpose of regime change, then you’ll see it as the key first step.

Whether bombing those sites was right or wrong then depends on your interpretation of what’s happening, what the purpose was.

I have no special information about this, but one thing I’m not doing is rushing to conclusions, e.g., that it’s wrong or it’s the start of WWIII, or whatever.

But that’s the narrative right now. I choose to ignore it, make up my own mind. If facts prove me wrong, then I’ll change it. But seems like “Israel owns the US including Trump”, once a counter narrative, is now the new narrative, and many seem caught up in that mania.

Reminds me of the covid vaccine. I didn’t take it, didn’t even say it was bad initially — just argued mandates were bad. People lost their minds over that because of the mania, the rush to conclusions about what was necessary and what “good people” obviously thought.

Turns out they were all wrong. We’ll see whether that’s the case here.