I’ll never understand the argument that “you’re saying they’re superior!”

Why cause they do bad stuff to get ahead and the other people in power play along with it?

What exactly are any of us supposed to do? Kill them? I’m really curious about the advice here.

I’ve heard this argument a lot.

Pointing out that a small group of people with evil tactics are capable of doing evil isn’t calling them superior in any way. It’s saying they’re evil so something must be done.

Seeing as how you label yourself a nationalist you should take issue with a group that belongs to a nation with no borders. A nation of people who will only be loyal to their own being allowed in your nation and allowed into positions of power.

“Who let them”

Mostly dead people who were traitors to their country. Is that enough of an answer?

I really don’t think your “we wuz” comparison makes any sense.

There are a lot of logical fallacies within the argument you’re making here.

Theres a lot of boomer type rhetoric and tone within this that I’m not huge on.

And realistically I just don’t think you’ve looked into the issue as much as you should for the kind of condemnation you’re giving to people who otherwise you’d be on the same side as.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

He used Kant being a proponent of Trannies to suggest “it’s not all Jews,” without knowing Mendelssohn was a massive influence on Kant.

Seems like a highly intelligent person who’s started running before they developed a base understanding of their arguments.

Huh. I don’t really know much about Kant. But searching his name with Moses.

https://jewishstudies.washington.edu/jewish-history-and-thought/immanuel-kant-moses-mendelssohn/

Got that. Soooo

Whites invited them in to fight the Nazis. Just like they are inviting Indians in now to “fight the Chinese in the tech war”. It was as bad then as it is now. And it’s not “the Jews” any more than it will be “the Indians” in 20 years. It’s the traitors that are letting them in and making excuses. And calling it a “Jewish conspiracy” absolves all the people that brought the Jews here ON PURPOSE to control the arms of the post war bureaucracy the built to control you. Just like saying “it’s the blacks” excuses the people that intentionally broke the black family and made pro-crime policy in order to weaponize them against you.

Jews have been in the United States since the 1600s.

Columbus was a Jew.

But even if what you’re saying is true.

Name them. Name the traitors

Or are you just saying traitors cause you’re making excuses? I don’t understand how saying “traitors” is any less of an excuse in your mind that me or anyone else saying “Jews”

Yeah, his point is fairly incomprehensible.

It seems to come down to blame the fool for letting them in?

Seems to completely absolve the jew, or the black, or otherwise for their actions.

Dwelling on mistakes of the past does nothing to solve the current issues at hand.

Yeah and I’m not sure the other groups mentioned really have the track record of being kicked out of every country they end up migrating to.

As far as I’m aware the British monarchs generally wanted Indians to stay in India for some *odd* reason.

And I mean blacks ended up here because of the Jewish slave trade so. There’s that.

https://video.nostr.build/51476682b7aa936fd75d56df962b64305622acf37240cf85a1ec0114bceee94e.mp4

Alright… now did you read the article? Or are you going to keep spraying diarrea everywhere?

“His point is incomprehensible” yet “sounds like a Jew/boomer”. Just admit you have no fuckifn clue what those groups think then.

If you want to stop grandstanding, my article was an idea to kill the IRS, ATF, all the intel agencies, etc. How about you summarize the point then and tell me if it accomplishes rhe goals.

“Nothing to solve the current issues at hand. Quick, keep playing name the new while NOT FUCKING READING THE PROPOSED SOLUTION” and playing distractionary ad hominem games.

I was replying to a thread where you compared people naming the Jew to black people saying we wuz kangz. I don’t see any article? I don’t really care about any article or any of those agencies. The only thing that will end any of those things is violence. Am I gonna do it? No. Are you? Probably not. Is that your idea? Unless that’s your idea it’s not going to work and it won’t be adopted by anyone in government. Good luck though.

I have no idea what which groups think? Boomers? They think whatever the tv tells them to.

I really don’t see how your point of “they’re making excuses cause they say Jew but I’m not cause I say traitor” makes sense. And I don’t see your well thought out retort to my question.

You started the ad hominem shit as far as I can tell by making the original comparison to we wuz nonsense. Sub Saharan Africans never even invented the wheel bud. Now go pull up an image of any cathedral in Europe and make that comparison.

It’s logically brain dead.

We’re not reading your article. Thanks though.