This is why we can’t have nice things. This is why I don’t play with the Nick Fuentes anti-Semite crowd despite agreeing with them about so much.

Yes, Jews own most of our institutions. Yes, the Talmud is messed up. Who brought them here? Who took us off the gold standard, thereby empowering Jewish banking institutions? Etc. If the Jews are such a powerful minority that such a small handful of them can supposedly dominate every advance civlization on earth, then you are literally making an argument that they are the REAL ubermensch who deserve the earth by right of conquest, since apparently no one else can figure anything out to stop them.

Every argument the Jewish conspiracy theorists use is logically identical to the we wuzzer black conspriacists who think there were the Egyptians and whatever until the mean white people came along and enslaved them.. miraculously… no introspection on how a supposedly barbaric “other” could have done that. No thought as to why many other groups avoided the same fate.

Total excuses. The actual cause is that the west abandoned Aristotelian metaphysical principles in favor of Platonist ones due to “the problem of free will”, “the problem of induction”, and the failure of thinkers like Locke to solve the issue of things/attributes/and essences. These things allowed the enlightenment worldview to be “critical theoried” to death. nostr:note145p883u82v3qmpep4e5p9pu9vcnumfnwmyup06uewl6lja2hfkmqzv2q89

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You sound jewish

I’m Irish. You have totally invalidated yourself. I don’t hide my face in this either. Congrats on being willfully ignorant.

The issues with Jewish power and influence in the west are specific, not a blanket statement that everything is the jews fault. That’s what the cucked rightwing influencers like Charlie Kirk say to dismiss and evade Nick’s arguments.

Address the “conspiracy theories” Nick supposedly engages with or promotes and tell us how they are not true instead of being vague about it.

It’s seems nostr:npub1te6ect9y5n3z9wn6lz0xluc4u8f8ssl730g28elxre96tvwqwvnqgneqew is a proponent of Tabla Rasa. He can correct me if I’m wrong there.

Blank slate theory is a lie, it is false.

If America was 100% Christian Indians, we wouldn’t have plumbing and we’d be shitting in the streets. If it was 100% Christian black we’d still be a violent shithole.

Ideology is important, but it only goes so far.

Genetics matter.

Yup, that’s the elephant in the room.

The reason why the NFL and NBA is mostly blacks is not because whites are not as interested or dedicated to basketball or football. Everyone knows this just like they know whites brought us the modern civilized world. Some just refuse to admit it.

Whites % of global population declining is very bearish for civilization.

The jews took control as a side effect of communism taking over institutional control of our institutions: Hollywood, the universities, etc. The issue is that Plato invented communism before Marx, and the French Revolution also turned communist real quick before napoleon took over. Just going “spot the Jew” does nothing to solve the problem, serves as a distraction from the issue, and often alienates those who AREN’T as bad as the rest of them from joining our side.

Removing the gov funding for colleges, ending college-controlled licensing gatekeeping, Nuremberg trialing the politicians responsible for COVID, etc WILL disproportionately affect non-whites (that’s the reality of race), but it is the fundamental that matters first. There were plenty of white accomplices that allowed this shit to happen, and idgaf what race or religion they are. I want them out of the way. Focus on the power. If Jews can’t help themselves, then that’s their fault.

That’s also why I like the Heinlein answer. “Service guarantees citizenship” and my own corollary “welfare disqualifies from the franchise”. We don’t have to use race qualifiers (nor should we) to know what races would be most affected by that rule. Don’t care. Don’t be a leech.

The white race didnt become superior by some miracle. They became superior because their family structure and dating culture (in the past) created an incentive structure that favored men of high intelligence, high vigor, and a sense of honor and adherence to abstract principles. This, over time, created the selective pressures for high quality men.

Other peoples can be held to the same standard and attain the same greatness… after many generations.

In the meantime and short term, fixes like what I mention will be much more beneficial and impactful to the lives of my white children that going “but Jews” at everything.

We can walk and chew gum at the same time.

No one relevant is blaming the jews for everything. That’s just a strawman designed to evade the specific problems caused by the influence of a uniquely loyal group of people on our institutions and political order. We can combat the issues you brought up, and also make AIPAC register under FARA, stop funding the genocide in Gaza, stop funding Israel all together since Mossad actively spies on our citizens, create legislation so Israelis or anyone with citizenship in another state cannot lobby, donate to politicians, or be in Congress, etc.

Pretending jews are just like any other race or ethnic group is either ignorant or deceptive.

Not trying to paint a strawman. I actually agree with registering aipac and ending all US assistance and involvement in Israel and her many wars. Israel DOES spy on us, and I want us to cut intel and military ties in the same ways and for the same reason I want us to cut off intel ties with the UK after they interfered in the last US POTUS election and demanded X spy on Americans (like myself) that reported on the grooming gangs. I would also much rather nuke India than fight China or Russia.

My “boomer” comments were due to the context. nostr:npub1m8d6pcrjhke48hasqgx7zkgjdt68u60px04frw753697mcmnyr3q365d6q decided to derail my article on constitutional reform into a conversation about blacks and Jews. HE actively decided I wasn’t allowed to chew gum because I WASN’T walking. And that’s not how this works. I was addressing issues within our white people consitition and how to fix it to end the freeloader shit. If you read the actual article, the goal is to end the forever lobbying that allowed AIPAC and big pharma to own our politicians the way they do now.

“But Jews. Quick, forget killing the bureaucracy forever by making laws—and the bureaucracies they create—have a ‘term limit of 15 years. Let’s pidgeonhole about Jews and blacks despite how many Jew-run and black promoting DEI programs that would end overnight”.

THAT is my issue. Notice NONE of you reference my article. We ended up talking about PEOPLE instead of POLICY despite the fact that the POLICY I posted was directly intended to remove the bad people you all pidgeonholed about.

Plato wasn’t a communist in the sense of communism today, so no.

Also Marx was jewish. Communism is jewish thought.

So again, blame the jew.

Why do you do everything possible but name them?

You seem subversive.

Subversive? I’ve called out trump for not releasing Epstein and playing bs games. I’ve frequently called for complete disentangling with Israel’s military actions/policies. I’ve called out basically every president of my lifetime and even back in time to the “beloved” Reagan as Traitors (Reagan for setting the amnesty precedent and for the NFA, among other things). AIPAC are foreign enemies, as are all the Chinese and Indians trump keeps letting in. Every NGO and church aiding the travel and housing of illegals as well. There are many others, but I could spend the rest of my life writing that list and still not be done.

But “blame the Jew” doesn’t catch the Christian churches facilitating the invasion on the southern border. Fry the Jews involved too, for sure, but hyper fixating on the Jews lets too many others like multiple church orgs involved off the hook for my liking. Let’s fry ALL the traitors because, in the end, the issue is that they are treasonous rats first and that they are Jews or Christians later. I want to cast the net that gets them both.

And, no, Plato’s communism of “philosopher kings” is actually more accurate to current communism than even the Marxist version because of rule by “the experts” (whether they know shit about their subject or care to do right by you regardless notwithstanding). Heck, Marx was racist against blacks and Asians too, even discouraging his daughter from marrying a guy because he might have a taint of Tatar blood. But the “multiculturalist” shit was derived from Marx, just expanded later by others (the same way Marx himself took from Hegel). But our current dystopia is an unholy marriage of Rousseau’s “Nobel savage” (selectively being applied to everyone BUT whites), Plato’s “experts” philosopher kings, and Marx’s deconstructionism and class warfare narrative (with race thrown in for added flair).

There you go.

Coherent rational thought.

Yeah, Regan is celebrated but he’s certainly one of our worst presidents.

We lost CA and several other states because of that dumb fuck.

The worst part wasn’t even the loss of CA, but the “inch that begot the miles”.

The Biden/harris/obama cabal imported more illegals than ever before in a single term in American history in order to FORCE the issue of amnesty again.

“But Reagan did it. What are you going to do, deport them all”.

Rest assured that they would have tried a different tactic if Reagan hadn’t given them that out.

Same goes for the NFA. “Fine, JUST full auto”. Now they are trying to redefine “semi-auto” to mean the same as full so that they can ban it all.

The slippery slope is real.

Agreed. Also, I owe you an apology. Not for our difference of opinion, but because of context.

Your first post “it’s the blacks” showed as being a response to my article about constitutional reform. So it looked like you were shit posting (no different than me saying “but what about monero” to something you posted about the Jews, for example). Apparently my notifications were fucked up. So you were never responding to the initial point I thought you were. Everything else was a combination of my honest opinions combined with defensiveness against what seemed to be a totally uncalled for side rail from that context. If you were wondering why I called you distractionary, that’s why. I don’t know why it showed that comment being tied to my post.

Now my stuff is fixed (coming home and having stable wifi helps I guess) and I see that I unknowingly crashed YOUR post, not the other way around.

Ha, yeah, I was wondering why you kept referring to your article.

I’m like “I haven’t seen it, I’m not reading it, wut?”

You seemed to be arguing in good faith but from a total non sequiter.

All good. Points made.

Nostr does have some issues with thread connectivity.

End of the day though, yeah, it’s the blacks 🤣

lol. I’ll argue yes and no. It IS, but it doesn’t HAVE to be. But agreed, it is right now. They collectively (with few exceptions) fell for the ideological trap and now they hate us and have teamed up with the bureaucracy to dogpile us while the bureaucracy and institutions run cover for their crimes (thereby begetting more of said crimes).

I’ll never understand the argument that “you’re saying they’re superior!”

Why cause they do bad stuff to get ahead and the other people in power play along with it?

What exactly are any of us supposed to do? Kill them? I’m really curious about the advice here.

I’ve heard this argument a lot.

Pointing out that a small group of people with evil tactics are capable of doing evil isn’t calling them superior in any way. It’s saying they’re evil so something must be done.

Seeing as how you label yourself a nationalist you should take issue with a group that belongs to a nation with no borders. A nation of people who will only be loyal to their own being allowed in your nation and allowed into positions of power.

“Who let them”

Mostly dead people who were traitors to their country. Is that enough of an answer?

I really don’t think your “we wuz” comparison makes any sense.

There are a lot of logical fallacies within the argument you’re making here.

Theres a lot of boomer type rhetoric and tone within this that I’m not huge on.

And realistically I just don’t think you’ve looked into the issue as much as you should for the kind of condemnation you’re giving to people who otherwise you’d be on the same side as.

He used Kant being a proponent of Trannies to suggest “it’s not all Jews,” without knowing Mendelssohn was a massive influence on Kant.

Seems like a highly intelligent person who’s started running before they developed a base understanding of their arguments.

Huh. I don’t really know much about Kant. But searching his name with Moses.

https://jewishstudies.washington.edu/jewish-history-and-thought/immanuel-kant-moses-mendelssohn/

Got that. Soooo

Whites invited them in to fight the Nazis. Just like they are inviting Indians in now to “fight the Chinese in the tech war”. It was as bad then as it is now. And it’s not “the Jews” any more than it will be “the Indians” in 20 years. It’s the traitors that are letting them in and making excuses. And calling it a “Jewish conspiracy” absolves all the people that brought the Jews here ON PURPOSE to control the arms of the post war bureaucracy the built to control you. Just like saying “it’s the blacks” excuses the people that intentionally broke the black family and made pro-crime policy in order to weaponize them against you.

Jews have been in the United States since the 1600s.

Columbus was a Jew.

But even if what you’re saying is true.

Name them. Name the traitors

Or are you just saying traitors cause you’re making excuses? I don’t understand how saying “traitors” is any less of an excuse in your mind that me or anyone else saying “Jews”

Yeah, his point is fairly incomprehensible.

It seems to come down to blame the fool for letting them in?

Seems to completely absolve the jew, or the black, or otherwise for their actions.

Dwelling on mistakes of the past does nothing to solve the current issues at hand.

Yeah and I’m not sure the other groups mentioned really have the track record of being kicked out of every country they end up migrating to.

As far as I’m aware the British monarchs generally wanted Indians to stay in India for some *odd* reason.

And I mean blacks ended up here because of the Jewish slave trade so. There’s that.

https://video.nostr.build/51476682b7aa936fd75d56df962b64305622acf37240cf85a1ec0114bceee94e.mp4

Alright… now did you read the article? Or are you going to keep spraying diarrea everywhere?

“His point is incomprehensible” yet “sounds like a Jew/boomer”. Just admit you have no fuckifn clue what those groups think then.

If you want to stop grandstanding, my article was an idea to kill the IRS, ATF, all the intel agencies, etc. How about you summarize the point then and tell me if it accomplishes rhe goals.

“Nothing to solve the current issues at hand. Quick, keep playing name the new while NOT FUCKING READING THE PROPOSED SOLUTION” and playing distractionary ad hominem games.

I was replying to a thread where you compared people naming the Jew to black people saying we wuz kangz. I don’t see any article? I don’t really care about any article or any of those agencies. The only thing that will end any of those things is violence. Am I gonna do it? No. Are you? Probably not. Is that your idea? Unless that’s your idea it’s not going to work and it won’t be adopted by anyone in government. Good luck though.

I have no idea what which groups think? Boomers? They think whatever the tv tells them to.

I really don’t see how your point of “they’re making excuses cause they say Jew but I’m not cause I say traitor” makes sense. And I don’t see your well thought out retort to my question.

You started the ad hominem shit as far as I can tell by making the original comparison to we wuz nonsense. Sub Saharan Africans never even invented the wheel bud. Now go pull up an image of any cathedral in Europe and make that comparison.

It’s logically brain dead.

We’re not reading your article. Thanks though.