Replying to Avatar Mike Brock

I have an unfinished book manuscript, I started writing in 2020. I'm actually quite happy with what's there. It's called "A World Worth Living In". It is my attempt to capture the constitution of the principles I think lead towards what you might call the "good life". It's a deeply philosophical book, and it tries to synthesize what I see as the best principles for thinking about the present, and how I think we could move towards the future.

I keep opening up Scrivener, and can't get past a writer's block. I think what's really happened is some pretty important assumptions I went into writing it, have shifted under my feet. In particular, a pretty deep re-evaluation of how I think about the problems and opportunity of technology.

That said, I've come to a conclusion. I think I'm going to try and repurpose some select portions of the manuscript I still think represent my current thoughts into some Medium posts in the coming months.

Also, I want to start a new manuscript, that tried to build my case for bitcoin. Why I think it's important. Where I think it's going. Where I think it's not going. And how it interfaces with political and cultural challenges. I speak to a lot of people who constantly tell me that they are glad I'm advancing the perspectives I am, and that I represent a thread of thought in bitcoin that has a decent amount of adherents, but there's really no corpus to capture what the full argument is. There is plenty of such sources of this from an anarchist and libertarian perspective. I want to give a shot at creating an argument that treads a lot closer to the classical liberal tradition.

I really feel like I need a new Sunday hobby.

Looking forward to seeing your thoughts when the writing comes together.

Enjoyed your interview with #[2], especially discussion of logical fallacies of black or white thinking, "What is The State?", "What is Freedom?", and heard another in the subtext of latter minutes surrounding Layer 3...."What is Trust?".

Curious if you'll incorporate some of those ideas into your manuscript. Indeed one could argue that trust is necessary to "Live the good life".

You say the foundation of your argument shifted. Tech moves fast. Maybe your original case still makes sense under the original framework you considered? This might even lead you to question "What is Truth?"

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Probably will see more of those philosophical points in some of the medium posts I plan to put together from the existing manuscript, than the bitcoin book.

We need a round 2

Ready when you are!