The “then you win” phase has nothing to do with being accepted by politicians and banks.
Discussion
But I don't see politicians and banks accepting Bitcoin. I see politicians and banks begging to be accepted by Bitcoin.
We already left their world. Now they're asking to be let into ours.
The “then you win” phase has nothing to do with being accepted by politicians and banks.
Ad Nauseum/Argument by Repetition
"This fallacy occurs when someone repeats a claim multiple times, expecting that the repetition will make it more convincing or true. However, repetition doesn't add any new evidence or logical support to the claim, and it doesn't address the counterarguments or criticisms that have been raised."
I do agree, at the finality of the winning phase, politicians and banks will not exist.
But there will be transitional stages along the way. Perhaps some of them involve politicians pandering to Bitcoiners.
I suppose the argument lies in where one delineates the start of the winning phase.
The “then you win” phase has nothing to do with being accepted by politicians and banks.