But that’s just a very basic misunderstanding of open source development. It’s like getting upset because there’s a grant for Linux or WordPress
Need to hear Michael nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m's side on whether this is true or just a rumor, but I am not surprised either way. If Microstrategy is going to transition to a Bitcoin Development company, it would not make sense for them to support any open source work that would hurt their business market.
Of course it's the wrong way to go, but we're coming out of a fiat world with corporate feudalism being the norm. We just need to make it clear that those structures will not stand in the new world.
nostr:note1snfrj747huaw8kn4yyd7tjfljhqxcydetuj0yfmjk04hdm6hmr9qcum039
Discussion
I might be reading this differently than you are. What if Microsoft or Apple told Blackrock that they were no longer supposed to fund any open source development?
👋 Hey! Interested in a new opportunity?💼 Join a company changing lives! Act now - don't miss out!💰 Make $3,000 daily, $15,000 weekly!👇 Join here: https://t.me/Walmartinvestmentloans
That’s not very realistic, it’s like saying openAI is afraid of a new tensorflow version. That open source part is open source for very good reasons (better security, testing, having brains from universities viewing and reviewing) and all the value delivered to customers come from how the company uses that part.
For Bitcoin it’s the same, better security, cryptography, etc.. come from open source, if a company wants to build their own Bitcoin you end up with a crap like BCH or BSV which the market does not like.
It makes zero business sense, that can’t be the reason