# Addressing the Decline in Birth Rates

Global birth rates are in decline, a trend that governments find alarming. A dwindling population could lead to a host of economic and social issues, but the policy responses have been largely ineffective. Financial incentives for families, like direct payments, tax breaks, and subsidized child care, have been deployed, but with little impact. This reveals a deeper, fundamental issue.

To understand the decline, it's crucial to figure out why couples are having fewer children. The common responses are either a lack of interest or financial constraints. While we should respect the choice not to have children, it's the financial concern that needs addressing.

Having children has become an expensive undertaking. From medical costs related to childbirth to time off work, government-mandated expenses like car seats, and the added costs of larger living spaces and education, families are stretched thin financially. Even households with two earners often struggle to make ends meet, making it harder to consider expanding the family.

The decline of single-earner households, where one parent could stay home to raise children, can be traced back to the massive expansion of rent seeking. The bureaucratic state has increased massively in all sorts of industries, and the inflation that has funded their expansion has driven up all kinds of costs, including essential resources like health care, education and housing. Both parents often need to work just to maintain a moderate standard of living.

A significant reason for these inflated costs is the fiat monetary system. Inflation has eroded the savings and earning power of average families, compelling both parents to enter the workforce. Moreover, real estate prices have soared, making it challenging for families to afford larger homes that could accommodate more children.

In essence, the decline in birth rates is not a consequence of individual choice or even culture but a byproduct of a kleptocratic monetary system that has made child-rearing unaffordable. Unless structural changes are made to restore the financial viability of having larger families, any superficial policy incentives are unlikely to reverse the declining birth rates. These economic incentives are giving back to families just a tiny portion of what's being stolen through the fiat monetary system. Stopping this inflationary theft would empower families to have more children, but such a move would require political will that is currently lacking.

What we need is a new monetary system and the path is not through political reform, but through the adoption of a new money. Bitcoin really is the fix for low birth rates.

Learn more at fiatruinseverything.com

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Nailed it Jimmy 🎯

If things don’t work out with my current GF, I’m gonna go to Japan and repopulate that country myself.

πŸ’― πŸ’₯ 🀯

I agree with the issue you're trying to illuminate. It's happening everywhere, including in my country, Thailand. Another way is that instilling foundational principles to grow towards adopting Bitcoin from a young age could be a way that doesn't rely on politics.

You nailed it.

By the way, I cannot click the link at the end of this note. It shows as just a plain text.

On the other hand we hear increasing population is a problem. Well this is something different, by very related to birth rate. Isn't it an issue only for the expansive fiat system?

It's a problem for markets also because the small population of strong young folk with low skills is very small, and the middle age group 35-50 is small and the 50+ is growing.

This means that those old people can't retire, and that also makes it harder for the young to get into work, and the burden on families taking care of their sick old relatives is set to increase, and decrease their capacity to divert resources to entrepreneurship.

it's going to be a slow motion trainwreck.

Yes, but my point was something different. It is natural that the expansive fiat system requires high birth rates. But what about a bitcoin standard economy? What if we don't suffer under the Cantillion effect and get advantage from technological innovation?

I think there could be a secondary effect of inflation on birth rates. Fertility seems to be decreasing over time which doesn't make sense from evolutionary standpoint. So it has to be the environment that damages people to the point of being unable to conceive.

And indeed, many people who stopped listening to fiat-funded pseudo-science and started eating differently, getting light exposure etc fixed their issues. nostr:npub1gdu7w6l6w65qhrdeaf6eyywepwe7v7ezqtugsrxy7hl7ypjsvxksd76nak talks about this a lot.

And curiosly I know a couple that decided to postpone having children because of health issues unrelated to sex organs. They most likely could have children but found it irresponsible to have them before they heal. And funnily enough the issues seem to be preventable with better, non-fiat food according to the research.

I wonder how many similar couples are there? I guess not zero.

haha "gov mandated car seats"

πŸ™ˆπŸ™‰πŸ™Š

3 kids here, we were not the norm for our age. All millennials took an additional 10 years to get married, start having kids.

As with fiat, everyone believes the lies of the culture. Get a job, travel, have fun. When it’s time, have kids.

In general, we are a morally bankrupt society which drives all types of issues.

It's also possible that the crippling, rising debt levels from a college education is a factor that can impact short to mid term statistics.

You make some firm statements - do you have anything to back these up?

Has been on reading list for a while so would appreciate any book recommendations please :)