Itâs funny when I hear/see conservatives say things like this. Because the only years the U.S. has had a âsocialistâ president. Is known as the golden years. The golden years are also the time period those same conservatives want to return to. This style of governing was so prosperous for the majority of Americans that FDR is the only president to serve 4 terms. But you have been convinced by your corporate overlords that itâs bad. The only thing that was bad, is that they (the corporate overlords) were paying their fair share of funding the country. When you say âWe could afford it â what youâre actually saying is âtheyâ could afford itâ. Because you arenât one of them. if âyouâ could afford anything, you wouldnât be complaining.
Discussion
Cool bro. Have fun in your statist matrix. Now fuck off will you
Tell me, what is âstatist matrixâ ??
Believing voting harder makes a difference. Thinking in terms of left and right. Not to mention your socialist nonsense of âfair shareâ etc.
Honestly I donât believe youâre in bitcoin as long as you claim to be because you clearly havenât developed a comprehensive, systemic view on the relation of state and society.
I therefor doubt you really understand the problem Bitcoin solves.
BTC is just a currency that fits into a digital future easier than fiat. This thought that the future is prosperous without a central driving force is QAnon bullshit. If governments donât exist, you will be ruled by CEOâs. Those that control the resources , control the people. BTC isnât going to set you free. Itâs a fantasy. Example: 21M BTC in existence. Governments control 18M of them. How does the rules change?
Give me a comprehensive view on what happens to a corporation/asset that has a value of $1trillion but only has 1BTC worth 10M in fiat because they didnât own any before the world adopted?
