more disingenuous bullshit from STN

the sender and receiver and amount are perfectly hidden (its more like a hash than formal encryption) and not tied to any IRL information

the fee is known.

its true its published to a blockchain.

its false to say LN txs are not published. they're "published" to the peers that route the payment.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

the routing is more like an onion actually, with intermediate nodes not being able to see all the details. then with bolt12 it changes even more

yeah

they see their own details.

just to say its incorrect to say that no data leaks to anyone when a LN tx is made

I think they're both imperfect, key difference being it's way too hard to get to a good privacy level with lightning, so almost nobody bothers. the DNM people are fine staying where they are for now.

the main difference afaict

with LN

you cant actually quantify your privacy

and like you say, high barrier to entry.

with Monero

you have quantifiable privacy

with a low barrier to entry.

STN constantly fudding as if this was NOT the case

and people like nostr:nprofile1qqsr9cvzwc652r4m83d86ykplrnm9dg5gwdvzzn8ameanlvut35wy3gpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejszxrhwvaz7tmddahxzepwdf3r2dfwvdhk6w3cxqurqqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkc0v9nh0 making stupid blanket statments,

are harmful to real world user privacy.

a normal person who just wants to buy a bag of MDMA is not going to attempt self-custody lightning. you would have to be stupid to think a normal person would go through that much trouble. they could either use a custodial lightning wallet or monero. now why doesn't anyone head on over to the DNM forum known as Dread and try to convince everyone to either learn 80 bajillion new steps or give up self-custody? they're not going to do either.