A lot of history books are because of the lies in them lol

Wise. Deeper truth.

If you take into consideration that some books are based on true stories, with a little spark sometimes to get it interesting and that math/physics books will only not be fiction until someone "resolves" a problem or discover a "solution" that defiants what was believed to be truth...until then...maybe all is a bit of fiction mixed with with a bit of truth and perception.

Fuck me 😦🤯

Everything is a distortion of the ultimate truth but yeah, everything, including some stuff in math and physics books (speaking as an applied mathematician and mechanical engineer) is a distortion to a greater or lesser degree.

Everything is fiction by omission because every stated conclusion has preconditions and implications creating complications contradicting dicta in between the lines, not by design but designated by the only truth: all is in relation and relief reliably provoking disbelief.

Listen to “Jordan Peterson biblical series” 15 episodes in chronological order on YouTube and this question and these kind of questions make much more sense. It’s like 40 hours listening but will change the way you look at the world. Thank me later. I mean zap me later 😂

Not necessarily fiction, but narrative! Narrative vs Empiric is the split you may be thinking - Peterson underlines this from a narrative viewpoint and how narrative/story undergirds thought and culture patterns, from which math and physics attempt to detangle themselves and where most people get lost along the way. Picturing Quantum Processes by Bob Coecke & Aleks Kissinger shows a nice diagrammatic system that scales between the maths/phsyics/comp sci/language and after the math/diagrams they break down how it relates to each field. I would recommend Maps of Meaning by Jordan Peterson and Picturing Quantum Processes by Bob Coecke & Aleks Kissinger