Blockchain and create your own brand. Zap away, but Bitcoin is protected intellectual property.
Discussion
Craig, is that you?
Quite certain Craig did not invent bitcoin nor blockchain, and why would craig claim it if open source and mit? Doesn’t add up, just like Eddie’s story.
So who owns the term Bitcoin then?
P.S. see how ridiculous the concept of IP is? Trying to own a word. Trying to ban billions of people from speaking freely, because somebody supposedly owns their tongues.
Satoshi Nakamoto of course, who published the white paper.
A white paper is a technical proposal. Nothing more.
And intellectual property rights.
That’s how publications work you know.
Open source. You still fail to grasp the concept.
Open source doesn’t mean having rights to violate and infringe on a brand. I don’t think that’s what open sourcing means.
What you think is irrelevant. Open source means that the source code can be copied and modified without legal recourse.
The entire fucking internet runs on open source software.
So? Even if I roll with the ridiculous concept of current ip laws, Satoshi did not register a brand, the word is widely used on common language -> cannot be protected as a brand
Doesn’t need to when publishing it, and owning the intellectual property rights, as without given permission and consent, in writing, since a commercial property, we simply may not.
Satoshi simply doesn’t have to.
LOL. So the already logically impossible ip laws are not enough, now every word is property of the first person to use it 😂
First person to publish it, as finding motive for thieving and corruption somehow is easier than trying to justify how slutty she was dressed when charged with rape
Sorry, it can’t be rape that word was trademarked by Epstein LLC.
Epstein?
Relevant to bitcoin how except describing how the rapists?
Guess Epstein describes the situation quite well. Happy ending is it?
About as well as your rape analogy, but I have a feeling that you are not able to understand what I mean.
To be anal about things you mean since missing is a dead end?!
And funny enough, intellectual property right don’t have an expiration date.
What is Intellectual Property?
Intellectual property (IP) refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works; designs; and symbols, names and images used in commerce.
Now, if you just scroll down a bit further you would see the different types of Ip and that most of them need active registration and all expire.
Not a question of literary rights to be discussing copyrights as copyright implies, is it?
First to publish is first to claim the intellectual properties on cyberspace too.
Ruling stands
So, if Satoshi was not the involved in the publishing on GitHub and consented to the MIT license… why did he never oppose it?
He has plenty of time before he disappeared, since it’s been on there since 2009y
How do you know that is the case?
Maybe he was gagged by those people mothering bitcoin?
Or what say you, #[7]? That’s what Twitter is good at, ain’t it? To gag and rape people while pedo profiteering?
Besides, just because she didn’t scream at the rapists when gagged, does it mean she consented?
You’re so funny… satoshi was able to write to Cypherpunks from a email address to this day not traced to a person, but somehow it was censored?
And on top of that he wanted to protect a brand that he didn’t register 😂
Yet published research and white papers defining the protocols and bitcoin as a proof of work.
Doesn’t need to register brand as little as musicians need to register their work besides proof of publication, which blockchain and bitcoins white paper constitute as.
The Bitcoin whitepaper is truth.
My Bitcoins remain in cold storage.
Your arguments are invalid.
Oh, but he does. You are confusing copyright and brands.
And copyright he gave up freely by encouraging sharing the whitepaper explicitly in his emails.
Intellectual property rights are protected as well as brands and copyrighted material.
Bitcoin is an intellectual property as a proof of work for blockchain as a decentralized protocol.
Intellectual property rights are protected the same way, the Mafia protects your store.
But you are not only trying to argue that the Mafia business model is legit, you think it doesn’t go far enough.
Nothing you said is true according to international IP laws.
Yet binary causality is even more difficult to overcome than organic causality, but guessing explaining how temporal mechanics work and what the fallout of false cored temporal causality means, such as when having been caught stealing taking over something that’s not ours to take.
That’s organized crime, what is the governments excuse?
Mobsters end up shot in the head on the sidewalk as history entails.