> You can send up 70 UTXOs
Don't you see how consolidating these would be very bad?
Maybe you meant you can get ~70 UTXOs out from a Tx0?
> Whrilpool have no censorship
Only government can censor.
Everything else is just a private entity deciding who they do business with.
> does noy work with chainanalysis
Neither does zkSNACKs. Or do you say you are "working" with a shopkeeper when you buy something from the store?
> Its a zerolink cj and it breaks deterministic links
The protocol #[6] designed is being used but unfortunately, Scamourais understanding of it is similar to Roger Ver's understanding of the Bitcoin whitepaper.
Both are naively nitpicking on the wording.
Hiding the toxic change and different input values in one transaction before a coinjoin does nothing against observers, but it does cost more in mining fees.
> no address reuses or merges.
How about the consolidation of multiple toxic change outputs to join a pool?
Regarding address reuse, afaik neither implementation has them at the moment but it's a problem in both projects history. It might become a thing again in the future, like when Wasabi needs to allow payments in coinjoins.
https://twitter.com/brian_trollz/status/1283525347007442944
https://twitter.com/brian_trollz/status/1445065052118261776
Its really funny that all the Anti-Samourai boys has one thing in common. They have absolutly no clue how Whirlpool works. That means you can't take them serious π
Except that I apparently know better how Whirlpool works than you, based on this comment of yours that I already replied to π
> You can send up 70 UTXOs
Don't you see how consolidating these would be very bad?
Maybe you meant you can get ~70 UTXOs out from a Tx0?
Very solid argument. Good job.
I don't talk with Waalshitty shillers. Senseless as they are promoting anti freedom tech on their new echo chamber. π
Oh course you don't. It's safer to stay within your LARP Kliq, not respond to questions, avoid thinking and blindly hail the almighty Scamourai devs.
Any honest researcher or DYORin pleb would look in to my claims and try to debunk them or ask questions.
Pussies ignore unfavorable comments.
I don't have the time to explain it to the Wasabi shiller boys on a daily basis.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Anti-samourai Bitcoiners are warning others about how Whirlpool works since we are easily able to unpeel the deterministic links from the tx0 premix:
#[7]
#[8]
Wasabi makes EVERY spend a coinjoin instead, so you never reveal any other addresses belong to you:
#[9]
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
No chainalysis? No censorship?
LUL you Wasabi guys .... seems you have no clue about your own implementation as well π

You Scamourai guys don't seem have a clue about what censorship means, what's the difference between Chainalysis and chain analysis, how Wasabi works or how the thing you blindly shill and support actually works.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed